Court Explains 1st Amendment To Tulsi Gabbard In Dismissing Her Ridiculous Lawsuit Against Google

[sun rise]

Court Explains 1st Amendment To Tulsi Gabbard In Dismissing Her Ridiculous Lawsuit Against Google

Just a week after the 9th Circuit easily upheld the dismissal of Dennis Prager's silly lawsuit against Google for supposed anti-conservative bias, a district court has easily dismissed Rep. Tulsi Gabbard's quite similar lawsuit against Google for... anti-Tulsi bias or some such nonsense. As we pointed out when the lawsuit was first filed, the case stood no chance at all, and was using completely debunked and rejected legal theories.


Judge Stephen Wilson made short work of the case, explaining to Gabbard and her Pierce Bainbridge lawyers how the 1st Amendment works, because the theory of it they presented in her case is... not it. Indeed, the court cites to the PragerU ruling from last week:

 

[Nakosis]

Hoorah for capitalism.

 

[SomeRandom]

Oh PragerU. Lol. Bunch of twats anyway.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Court Explains 1st Amendment To Tulsi Gabbard In Dismissing Her Ridiculous Lawsuit Against Google

Just a week after the 9th Circuit easily upheld the dismissal of Dennis Prager's silly lawsuit against Google for supposed anti-conservative bias, a district court has easily dismissed Rep. Tulsi Gabbard's quite similar lawsuit against Google for... anti-Tulsi bias or some such nonsense. As we pointed out when the lawsuit was first filed, the case stood no chance at all, and was using completely debunked and rejected legal theories.


Judge Stephen Wilson made short work of the case, explaining to Gabbard and her Pierce Bainbridge lawyers how the 1st Amendment works, because the theory of it they presented in her case is... not it. Indeed, the court cites to the PragerU ruling from last week:

Google is biased to the left. People would have to be blind not to see it.

 

[sun rise]

Google is biased to the left. People would have to be blind not to see it.

The right thinks so. But the facts are something else. I'm sure confirmation bias will cause those who believe in bias to reject this:

Google Isn't Really Biased Against Conservative Websites – Here's Why

 

[Shad]

The right thinks so. But the facts are something else. I'm sure confirmation bias will cause those who believe in bias to reject this:

Google Isn't Really Biased Against Conservative Websites – Here's Why

Fluff piece. I have seen censorship first hand using vpns and search engines. Experiment versus arguments from authority with zero evidence.

 

[gnomon]

Hoorah for capitalism.

What?

Fluff piece. I have seen censorship first hand using vpns and search engines. Experiment versus arguments from authority with zero evidence.

Wh---What?!

 

[Nakosis]

What?

Private ownership. Keeps the government out of running companies.

 

[gnomon]

Private ownership. Keeps the government out of running companies.

Quite right. I had a momentary lapse of reason.

 

[columbus]

Private ownership. Keeps the government out of running companies.

Because that's how we keep the Cuyahoga River from catching fire. Private ownership and free markets!
Tom