Creation and Evolution

[McBell]

I was directed to a link about that. The origin of DNA as for evolution is pure theory. I don't like theories.

Yes, you referred to it as fiction right after admitting you did not read it.
I was going to ask with what credentials you so eagerly dismissed it, but I figured it would be yet another question ignored by you.

 

[CarlinKnew]

So you're saying that DNA was created by a molecule that was super intelligent to devise a way to self replicate itself to become molecules, and it created something called self-replicators, which removed other configurations? What other configurations did the molecule have?

Yeah dude, it all started with a super intelligent molecule. Because molecules have brains, y'know. It's good to see that you're applying yourself and really trying to understand.

 

[Night&Day]

What I find interesting is that you are so stuck on the word "created" that you cannot see the forest through the trees.

Oh. let me rephrase my response, so I can see the forest.

So you're saying that DNA accidentally came about by a molecule that accidentally self replicated itself to become molecules, and as it accidentally self-replicated over time, it accidentally removed other configurations? What other configurations did the molecule have?

 

[McBell]

Oh. let me rephrase my response, so I can see the forest.

So you're saying that DNA accidentally came about by a molecule that accidentally self replicated itself to become molecules, and as it accidentally self-replicated over time, it accidentally removed other configurations? What other configurations did the molecule have?

Thank you for further proving my point.

 

[Night&Day]

Yeah dude, it all started with a super intelligent molecule. Because molecules have brains, y'know. It's good to see that you're applying yourself and really trying to understand.

LOL... that was the point that I wa trying to make

 

[Night&Day]

Thank you for further proving my point.

Any time

 

[CarlinKnew]

I was directed to a link about that. The origin of DNA as for evolution is pure theory. I don't like theories.

Haha yeah man nobody likes theories, especially not the ones that led to the medicine you've taken, the cars you've driven in, and the computer you're using. Theories suck!

 

[Night&Day]

Yes, you referred to it as fiction right after admitting you did not read it.
I was going to ask with what credentials you so eagerly dismissed it, but I figured it would be yet another question ignored by you.

I read it.. not all. I read stuff like that before... it's was nothing new to me. What are the proofs? maybe you can tell me...

 

[CarlinKnew]

LOL... that was the point that I wa trying to make

Yep you've certainly made a point to remain ignorant. You know children sometimes have difficulty letting go of anthropomorphisms.

 

[McBell]

I read it.. not all. I read stuff like that before... it's was nothing new to me. What are the proofs? maybe you can tell me...

Right after you prove god exists.

Remember YOU claimed to want to keep this a two way street and you have loads of questions to answer before I even entered the thread.

 

[Looncall]

Instead of saying absolutely NOTHING, why didn’t you just answer the question, where is NASA’s proof, in regards to the billions of years?

If you are at least half intelligent, you should be able to answer it.

Here is a web site that describes this.

WMAP- Age of the Universe

One method described uses the distribution of types of stars in distant globular cluster galaxies to compute an age for the universe.

Another method not mentioned there uses the observed distibution of primordial radioisotopes. It is known how they are formed in stars. The fact that isotopes with half lives below a certain value are not found on earth indicates that the matter that makes up the earth is old enough for those isotopes to have decayed.

I'm not sure why you are so fixated on NASA. There are experts in other places too.

 

[Night&Day]

Haha yeah man nobody likes theories, especially not the ones that led to the medicine you've taken, the cars you've driven in, and the computer you're using. Theories suck!

hahaha... there's a difference between theories that are proven and those that are not. the bible talks about medicines and many other things that were considered a joke, only for some to be proven...

BTW, I never said theories suck. I said I don't like them..

 

[Looncall]

hahaha... there's a difference between theories that are proven and those that are not. the bible talks about medicines and many other things that were considered a joke, only for some to be proven...

BTW, I never said theories suck. I said I don't like them..

Scientific theories are explanations of collections of facts. I guess you prefer ignorance.

 

[Night&Day]

Yep you've certainly made a point to remain ignorant. You know children sometimes have difficulty letting go of anthropomorphisms.

Igmorance always call others ignorant... you should have learned that.

 

[CarlinKnew]

hahaha... there's a difference between theories that are proven and those that are not. the bible talks about medicines and many other things that were considered a joke, only for some to be proven...

BTW, I never said theories suck. I said I don't like them..

Oh really? What's the difference between a scientific theory that is proven, and a scientific theory that is unproven? You don't know what you're talkin about bro. Maybe it's time to open your eyes and actually look into this stuff.

 

[McBell]

Igmorance always call others ignorant... you should have learned that.

I agree.
But since that has nothing to do with the fact that those who are intelligent also call those who are ignorant ignorant you pointing it out does not help you.

 

[Night&Day]

Scientific theories are explanations of collections of facts. I guess you prefer ignorance.

Ignorance always call others ignorant... theories are a collection of facts yes, but on a whole must be proven to be truth... get it right

 

[Night&Day]

I agree.
But since that has nothing to do with the fact that those who are intelligent also call those who are ignorant ignorant you pointing it out does not help you.

??? OK.. You are the author of knowing all

 

[PolyHedral]

So you're saying that DNA was created by a molecule that was super intelligent to devise a way to self replicate itself to become molecules, and it created something called self-replicators, which removed other configurations? What other configurations did the molecule have?

I never said anything about intelligence. Intelligence isn't required for atoms to move around and join together.

 

[Night&Day]

Oh really? What's the difference between a scientific theory that is proven, and a scientific theory that is unproven? You don't know what you're talkin about bro. Maybe it's time to open your eyes and actually look into this stuff.

It means that an idea has merit, but because it cannot be proven truth, it remains an idea, not reality or truth…