questfortruth
Well-Known Member
You mean the first stage was without space and without time?As with any hypothesis of how the universe began it is a hypothesis showing how it could have appeared out of nothing.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You mean the first stage was without space and without time?As with any hypothesis of how the universe began it is a hypothesis showing how it could have appeared out of nothing.
Without space is energy mass cold held.You mean the first stage was without space and without time?
Science does not support Creation from nothing out of nothing. There is absolutely nothing whatsoevers in terms objective evidence that absolute nothing, therefore any mathe must begin with the assumption that absolute nothing existed without any evidence to support the conclusions.
Not from nothing, but from spacetime continuum.At the quantum level particles are popping into existence all the time from nothing.
The mathematics can show this as the math-law.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360014214_INFINITIES_IN_RIEMANN_AND_ABC_CONJECTURES
If you are infinitely rich and lost the perfect 100 % of your money, how can you remain infinitely rich?
You can. You can lose all 100 % countless times and, during all time, remain infinitely rich.
This Rhyme resonates with me: ``you are amusing to Me; you are
the Mystery.'' (Madonna, Like a Prayer) Like the Father sings about my way
of doing mathematics and science.
More in:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361109202_ABOUT_DIVINE_AND_SCIENCE
In order for anything to exist something must be eternal.
That is not something from nothing.
Nice try.
At the quantum level particles are popping into existence all the time from nothing. Particles colide, annihilate each other and you are left with nothing
Therefore everything comes from something.
This is not the 'absolute nothing of philosophy and apologetics, which is the assumption of the math model proposed in this thread for which there is no evidence that this nothing ever existed. The failure of the math hypothesis is that it requires the assumption that 'absolute nothingness' existed in the past.
Quantum nothing is not in reality nothing. It can be measured and quantified a 'Quantum something.'Quantum level particles pop into existed from the 'Quantum world' at zero point gravity.
Physicists Just Measured Quantum 'Nothingness' at Room Temperature
"Physicists have measured the sound of 'nothingness' at room temperature - an important step in our future ability to listen in to the Universe.
You can think of it a little like this - we've now been able to measure the way some of the ubiquitous 'background noise' of space interacts with our equipment, which will hopefully help us tune it out going forward.
After all, the entire Universe is crackling with the static of quantum physics, and in order to be able to pick up the faint echoes of distant astronomical giants - such as the gravitational waves rippling off a black hole merger, for example - we need to be able to tune out the quantum static.
But let's take a step back. What exactly does it mean to measure the sound of 'nothingness'?
By now most of us know that there's nothing empty about the vacuum - it's actually filled with quantum fluctuations. We can't 'hear' these fluctuations, but for the sensitive equipment scientists use to measure the minute distortions of space-time, they can create subtle effects that can be deafening.
This experiment looked at a phenomenon called quantum radiation pressure, which arises when particles interact with detectors such as LIGO - the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory in the US, responsible for confirming the existence of gravitational waves a little over three years ago.
This quantum radiation pressure becomes a type of 'noise' that can interfere with results. But, like other quantum phenomena, we would usually need to study it at ultra-cold temperatures in order to keep the particles still and figure out what's going on."
Philosophy has nothing to do with it.
There is a lot of quantum something around the quantum nothing
What is a quantum fluctuation? Could it possibly be the disturbance caused by participating popping into and out of existence?
And it seems to me that the apologetics flooded your post, we are talking vacuum bubbles, not gravitational waves
. . . . because this is an apologetic attempt at a math proof for the beginning of our physical existence by @quest for truth it is a philosophical/theological attempt to proof the beginning of our physical existence from absolute nothing. This would be the basis of the apologetic argument that Creation was from 'absolute nothing,' therefore God must exist,
A scientific argument was not proposed to support the 'beginning of our physical existence' from Quantum nothing.' .
There is absolutely no evidence that our physical existence had an absolute beginning either from the theological/philosophical belief, nor from the scientific perspective of Quantum nothing.'
Though I demonstrated with a good reference that 'Quantum Nothing' is in reality not nothing by definition.
. . . . because this is an apologetic attempt at a math proof for the beginning of our physical existence by @quest for truth it is a philosophical/theological attempt to proof the beginning of our physical existence from absolute nothing. This would be the basis of the apologetic argument that Creation was from 'absolute nothing,' therefore God must exist,
A scientific argument was not proposed to support the 'beginning of our physical existence' from Quantum nothing.' .
There is absolutely no evidence that our physical existence had an absolute beginning either from the theological/philosophical belief, nor from the scientific perspective of Quantum nothing.'
Though I demonstrated with a good reference that 'Quantum Nothing' is in reality not nothing by definition.
Our perception of quantum things is based on the concept of space-time,
The mathematics can show this as the math-law.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360014214_INFINITIES_IN_RIEMANN_AND_ABC_CONJECTURES
If you are infinitely rich and lost the perfect 100 % of your money, how can you remain infinitely rich?
You can. You can lose all 100 % countless times and, during all time, remain infinitely rich.
This Rhyme resonates with me: ``you are amusing to Me; you are
the Mystery.'' (Madonna, Like a Prayer) Like the Father sings about my way
of doing mathematics and science.
More in:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361109202_ABOUT_DIVINE_AND_SCIENCE
Jesus Christ and satan have nothing in common, nothing mutual.from nothing.
Nonsense. Me and a unicorn have nothing in common, even if the unicorn is not present.Jesus Christ and satan have nothing in common, nothing mutual.
Even the presence is not mutual. Because the expression ``A and B have nothing in common'' is not possible if one of them is not present. But because they are present, they have absolutely nothing in common.
No ot isnt, it's a published mathematical paper. That hypothese based on a proven mathematical formula.