Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why do so many cultures past and present around the world have a creation myth?
These myths were how people understood the world they lived in.
Were they just primitive story tellers or do these myths still hold significance for us today?
Perhaps i am misunderstanding your use of the term world?They hold significance about who we are, how we think, and where we came from - not so much significance about the world.
Perhaps i am misunderstanding your use of the term world?
i get it now, thank you.About how the world came to be.
They are called 'creation myths' by anthropologists and sociologists and people who study or promote specific religions, and people who study literature of other cultures, etc., from a WESTERN perspective...that is, how do they compare with our superior Monotheistic or Atheistic stories about how and why the wolrd came to be...It's a western categorical placeholder, not a real cross-cultural concept...i get it now, thank you.
Perhaps.
It is interesting that they would be called creation myths.
Why do so many cultures past and present around the world have a creation myth?
These myths were how people understood the world they lived in.
Were they just primitive story tellers or do these myths still hold significance for us today?
There must have been reason for the anthropologists and sociologists to use the term creation myth?They are called 'creation myths' by anthropologists and sociologists and people who study or promote specific religions, and people who study literature of other cultures, etc., from a WESTERN perspective...that is, how do they compare with our superior Monotheistic or Atheistic stories about how and why the wolrd came to be...It's a western categorical placeholder, not a real cross-cultural concept...
yes, they classified the stories of other cultures based on their similarity to the creation story in Genesis.There must have been reason for the anthropologists and sociologists to use the term creation myth?
Which, according to the religions who claim it as their own, say it is indeed a literal account of creation.yes, they classified the stories of other cultures based on their similarity to the creation story in Genesis.
Do you mean a creator?What seems basic to the myths of all cultures is the intrinsic belief in the existence of a wholly Other.
They are called 'creation myths' by anthropologists and sociologists and people who study or promote specific religions, and people who study literature of other cultures, etc., from a WESTERN perspective...that is, how do they compare with our superior Monotheistic or Atheistic stories about how and why the wolrd came to be...It's a western categorical placeholder, not a real cross-cultural concept...
There must have been reason for the anthropologists and sociologists to use the term creation myth?
Do you not think that myth is an accurate term to use?If one is claiming that another's account is a myth,
then they are claiming that they themselves 'know' for certainty
how existence came to exist.
One of the reasons why I could not take Anthropology beyond first year.
Speculation in the guise of information is a sure sign of corporuption.
At least in Philosophy we are honest enough to admit our uncertainty.
Do you not think that myth is an accurate term to use?
Myth is condescending. It claims the account is untrue.
Now an account may be partly untrue, to a larger or lesser extent.
But who can say for certain about how the universe came into being?
We may just be in a highly complex computer game that itself could be
inside another highly complex computer game; almost to infinity.
There is no reason why this could not be true at all.
And any one of those games could consist of a universe which consists of say
a flat world resting on the back of a turtle flying through the cosmos.
Many millennia in the future we could construct such things, so there is no way
that anyone could be certain that we are not in such a construct.
I think we probably are.
China is the oldest and most enduring civilization in history. Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism came about in 400 to 500 BC in China yet China is much older going back 2,500 BC; and before Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism there was another belief --- a belief in one God. In the ancient Chinese writing which are known as pictographs similar to the ancient Egyptians it uses symbols to represent it's meaning.
And these meanings are strikingly similar to the Genesis creation account, the flood, and the tower of Babel.
Yeah, some myths have an element of truth to them and some do not. This creation myth just happens to be recorded by two peoples worlds apart.