How is it that you and others, Can consider a Prophecy to be a failed Prophecy, When the Prophecy hasn't happened Yet?
Now that's amazing.
So How you can consider a Prophecy that hasn't happened Yet, to be a failed Prophecy Go Figure
In Ezekiel Chapter 26, this Prophecy is still future from us to day. So how is it that you consider Chapter 26, to be a failed Prophecy, when it hasn't happened Yet.
Why do you suppose Christ Jesus said in Matthew 11:22--"But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you"
Well it's very obvious that the Prophecy of Tyre hasn't happened yet, not until the day of judgment, which is still future from us.
If you study out history, you would find there were two kings that went to conquer Tyrus,
King Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon and king Alexander the great.
That where once Tyrus was a great sea port back before king Nebuchadrezzar and king Alexander the great had conquered Tyrus.
That to day Tyrus is still there, but not the great sea port that it once was.
But for Tyrus itself will be taken down at the day of judgment, which is still future from us to day.
Why is it that your having such a hard time in figuring out that 2+2 equal's 4, which is just simple math.
That the Prophecy of Tyrus hasn't happened Yet, not until at the day of judgment which is still future from us to day.
So how is it, that you call a Prophecy that hasn't happened Yet, a failed Prophecy.
Which is still future from us to day.
So maybe before you grab hold of Chapter 26, you should put all the rest of the preceding chapters in Ezekiel together and the book of Revelation, and see where Tyrus stands in Prophecy. That is Yet to be fulfilled at the day of judgment, which is still future from us to day.
You seem to think that you know everything about Prophecy, So by all means do tell, who will be found as the king of Tyrus and Babylon in the book of Revelation, Which is still future from us to day ?