• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

D.C. Could Be The First U.S. City To Decriminalize Sex Work.

Skwim

Veteran Member

bra.png

Here are arguments from both sides of the debate.

Sex workers weigh in on what decriminalization would mean for their own lives


"Earlier this month, a clash over the criminalization of sex work ignited in the nation’s capital. Over the course of 14 grueling hours on Oct. 17, more than 170 people testified at the first-ever council hearing about a bill to fully decriminalize sex work in Washington, D.C. — including the buying and selling of sex. If the bill passes, the District will become the first U.S. city to decriminalize sex work, putting it at the vanguard of a growing movement that workers say would make them safer by preventing police abuse, increasing access to medical care and allowing them to make a living in the way that they choose. Many human rights groups and public health organizations agree: Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch support the full decriminalization of sex work, and the World Health Organization and the United Nations Population Fund say it would contribute to major global health gains.

However, there’s still fierce opposition to the Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019. The debate at last week’s hearing was so heated that councilmembers threatened to end the session early multiple times.

As The Washington Post reported, those who oppose the bill argued that decriminalizing the act of paying for sex would embolden pimps, sex traffickers and others who coerce and force people to sell their bodies. They also said it would turn the nation’s capital into a sex tourism destination.

“Residents of the District of Columbia should not be subjected to a social science experiment that we already know the consequences of,” LaRuby May, an attorney and a former D.C. Council member, said at the hearing. “This legislation will create more victims and subject our residents to more trauma.”

Advocates who support the legislation, meanwhile, say that decriminalization is an issue of safety for sex workers. Kate D’Adamo, a consultant with Reframe Health and Justice, an organization that works on harm reduction, says it’s okay to personally disagree with sex work. “All we’re talking about when we talk about decriminalization is violence … the violence of homelessness, of arrest and incarceration,” she says. “You can be in support of decriminalization and feel complicated about sex work.”

Sex workers have been organizing for decriminalization for decades, but their campaign has gained national momentum as attention to mass incarceration, police violence, the #MeToo Movement and the legalization of marijuana has grown. The passage of legislation known as “FOSTA-SESTA” — a bill intended to fight human trafficking by targeting websites used to sell sex — also became the focus of national attention last year. Sex workers opposed the legislation, arguing that the law would make them less safe by taking away their means to advertise online, thereby pushing them onto the street, where they are more vulnerable to violence and harassment. Reports show their predictions were likely right.

The Lily spoke to sex workers and activists who attended the hearing, testified and were involved in writing the bill to understand how criminalization has affected their lives. Committee members will vote on the legislation at a later date.​


______________________________________________________________________________________​



Tamika Spellman has been a sex worker for 37 years and is one of the architects of the decriminalization bill. She works for HIPS, a D.C.-based organization that helps people working in street-based economies, including drug users and sex workers.

The reason sex work is criminalized is simple, says Tamika Spellman: It’s about controlling women.

“I’m not a bad person,” Spellman says of her own decision to sell sex. “I’ve been a good parent, I’ve raised my kids well; I put them both through college through my work as a sex worker. I’m just as human as the person who lives next door to you.” Spellman says she has never had a problem with sex work in theory or in practice; instead, “society is the one with a problem with what I do,” she says.

Spellman doesn’t practice street-based sex work anymore. Now, she connects with clients online. That allows her to screen them for safety, she says, though the passage of FOSTA-SESTA has made online sex work more difficult.

But when Spellman did practice sex work in the streets, her life was often defined the criminalization of her work — she “hid in the shadows a lot,” she says. The number one reason, according to Spellman, was police harassment. She says she has been arrested three times in undercover prostitution stings."
source


Sounds good to me. :)


.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Sounds positive to me too.
I was kinda interested in this statement;

“Residents of the District of Columbia should not be subjected to a social science experiment that we already know the consequences of,” LaRuby May, an attorney and a former D.C. Council member, said at the hearing. “This legislation will create more victims and subject our residents to more trauma.”

What does she 'know', and how does she know it?
I am assuming she doesn't count sex workers as 'residents' so who is it being subjected to more trauma?

Meh...it was just one line out of the OP, but it confused me a little.
 

dianaiad

Well-Known Member
Sounds positive to me too.
I was kinda interested in this statement;

“Residents of the District of Columbia should not be subjected to a social science experiment that we already know the consequences of,” LaRuby May, an attorney and a former D.C. Council member, said at the hearing. “This legislation will create more victims and subject our residents to more trauma.”

What does she 'know', and how does she know it?
I am assuming she doesn't count sex workers as 'residents' so who is it being subjected to more trauma?

Meh...it was just one line out of the OP, but it confused me a little.

Didn't read the OP. The writer is on my ignore list. I am responding to the title of the thread, which may or may not bear any relationship to the content of the OP.

Prostitution is legal in the state of Nevada, including several cities. Not Los Vegas, ironically, but in other counties it is.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
A nice, elderly man has recently lost his wife of some decades. He's not attractive to many women, and he's not very adept, after 30-some years of marriage, at cruising for a pickup. But he is lonely, and he would really like some female company -- and yes, a bit more. Not only that, he's been reasonably successful at work, and can afford a few perks.

She's young, but struggling to find her way. Little family help, could really use a helping hand up, but there's not much available.

Tell me this -- why would a sexual act, accepted by her, paid for by him, useful to both, be wrong?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Didn't read the OP. The writer is on my ignore list. I am responding to the title of the thread, which may or may not bear any relationship to the content of the OP.

Prostitution is legal in the state of Nevada, including several cities. Not Los Vegas, ironically, but in other counties it is.
Legal is not the same as decriminalized.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
A nice, elderly man has recently lost his wife of some decades. He's not attractive to many women, and he's not very adept, after 30-some years of marriage, at cruising for a pickup. But he is lonely, and he would really like some female company -- and yes, a bit more. Not only that, he's been reasonably successful at work, and can afford a few perks.

She's young, but struggling to find her way. Little family help, could really use a helping hand up, but there's not much available.

Tell me this -- why would a sexual act, accepted by her, paid for by him, useful to both, be wrong?
You see, I have this book . . .
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
.

To those who read dianaid's silly comment on the title of my OP, it's taken word for from the original title of the article.

.
i think you meant to say "word for word".

At any rate this will be highly interesting if passed. I have posted a TED Talk by a sex worker advocating for this in the past. When I first started to listen I was opposed tobthecidea, but she made a very good case and I was ultimately convinced.

EDIT:

it seems to apply here so I dug it up.


I think that I offended @dianaiad one time too many too in refuting her. So she will probably miss it.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Didn't read the OP. The writer is on my ignore list. I am responding to the title of the thread, which may or may not bear any relationship to the content of the OP.

Prostitution is legal in the state of Nevada, including several cities. Not Los Vegas, ironically, but in other counties it is.

I think there is some small variance between the proposed decriminalization in Washington, and the existing regulations in Nevada.
Haven't spent too long checking, but I think in Nevada it's allowed in counties of under 400,000 people (not sure why, perhaps just to explicitly prevent 'sex tourism'?), and it's restricted to licensed premises.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I think there is some small variance between the proposed decriminalization in Washington, and the existing regulations in Nevada.
Haven't spent too long checking, but I think in Nevada it's allowed in counties of under 400,000 people (not sure why, perhaps just to explicitly prevent 'sex tourism'?), and it's restricted to licensed premises.
What Nevada has is not close to decriminalization. I would suggest watching the TED Talk that I linked. Decriminalization removes all legal restrictions on the trade.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
What Nevada has is not close to decriminalization. I would suggest watching the TED Talk that I linked. Decriminalization removes all legal restrictions on the trade.

Sorry, I worded it poorly, but yes, I know.
That's what I meant by the variance between 'proposed decriminalization' and 'existing regulations' in Nevada.

But I worded it in hurried fashion, and it wasn't clear.
*tips hat*
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
Woohoo!
Now all those politicians can get prostitutes without the fear of them being undercover cops in a vice sting.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
You can't possibly be that naive
Please, we all know who is naive here. You appear to have no clue when it comes to most if your posts.

By the way, if you oppose drug traffickers then you should know what the cure is. Stepping on the rights of people is not one of them.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Woohoo!
Now all those politicians can get prostitutes without the fear of them being undercover cops in a vice sting.
Well, we can't all be billionaire playboy presidents who write 6 figure checks to porno stars.
Some of us are on budgets.
Tom
 

Darkforbid

Well-Known Member
Please, we all know who is naive here. You appear to have no clue when it comes to most if your posts.

By the way, if you oppose drug traffickers then you should know what the cure is. Stepping on the rights of people is not one of them.

I don't oppose drug traffickers, having been one. Society in general does

Now if you could explain how someone who has spent the last 16 years living on the streets of Oxford is naive about other street workers. I promise to be very impressed
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I don't oppose drug traffickers, having been one. Society in general does

Now if you could explain how someone who has spent the last 16 years living on the streets of Oxford is naive about other street workers. I promise to be very impressed

It is hard to believe any of your claims. And even if you did abuse the system that does not mean that you understand it. In fact those one the street tend to be more naive than others, except for what it takes to avoid the law. You are as usual as far from an expert in the topic that you are talking about as possible.

If you can drop the rude attitude I will see if I can explain your errors to you.
 
Top