In another thread, the issue of dating preferences came up, and some posts stated that a heterosexual man's refusal to date a transgendered person because the latter has a penis is transphobic. Since I'm open to reconsidering my positions in light of reasoned arguments, I would like to hear others' thoughts on this.
Is having dating preferences such as the above a form of bigotry or a right?
Please discuss.
If a homosexual man is typically turned off by their potential partner having a vagina, why in the world would a heterosexual man not be typically turned off by their potential partner having a penis? It would go against their very sexual orientation not to be. In order to overlook such a.....erm "member" one would have to be poly or pansexual. That is to say having an attraction not as affected by the binary sexes as bi, gay and straight people are confined to. If you get me?
Why would it be bigotry? Not wanting to sleep with someone isn't being a bigot, I mean sometimes that might be the case with racists or whatever. But to most people it's merely to do with attraction.
If I don't want to sleep with another female does that mean I'm a bigot against lesbians? No of course not. It means I'm a heterosexual female!
Why then should heterosexual men be lambasted as transphobes for preferring vaginas? I don't get it. They are heterosexual! Not gay or bi. That's like saying if a heterosexual man won't sleep with another man he is actually a homophobe. It makes no sense. Being an ally for gay or trans people doesn't necessarily mean you would sleep with or date them for goodness sakes!
I respect a transgender person's right to do and live however they please. But this idea that because a man won't date them he is suddenly bigoted seems more like sour grapes at having not been laid to me. Not everyone in the world has to find you completely attractive in order to not be a bigot. Geez.