I think you are being stupid here. I suppose you have not heard of 'Synthetic Virology'. Check in Wikipedia at
Synthetic virology - Wikipedia. Also tell me as to what is your definition of 'life'. Are the viruses animate or inanimate? They may just be strands of RNA with no DNA. If today we are making synthetic viruses, we will perhaps create the DNA strands also in future. Today we have the capability of altering the DNA sequences.
TRUTH... is what you have so far demonstrated - is an inability to actually reason and form arguments for or against what you believe on a personal basis. If anything my posts show I am far from being stupid but able to reason about what must have happened for the first life to exist and to succeed on the planet we call home. Many people when they exhaust the sciences which cannot give a plausible or even acceptable reason for our existence turn to such things as 'Aliens did it' but instead you wish to proceed with man made options and ideas which at no point deal with creation of life itself or how the first life came into existence. Man studies that which is alive and exists. He cannot explain life.No matter how much he breaks down all the elements he comes up against a brick wall. You can keep trying to involve things which are not relevant trying to hide the fact you cannot make any sound arguments in science or any other method against the argument No God created a mature earth and all he created at the beginning. If you truly sought truth then you would know, as I have stated that man studies what is created. He can see that since the beginning of life nothing evolving today.
In 2000, the paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould famously declared that “there's been no biological change in humans in 40,000 or 50,000 years,” suggesting that evolution in humans is imperceptibly slow or has perhaps stopped altogether.
Has evolution stopped or did it not exist in the first instance?
"Synthetic virology is a branch of virology engaged in the study and engineering of synthetic man-made viruses. It is a multidisciplinary research field at the intersection of virology, synthetic biology, computational biology, and DNA nanotechnology, from which it borrows and integrates its concepts and methodologies. There is a wide range of applications for synthetic viral technology such as medical treatments, investigative tools, and reviving organisms."
We know, and I have stated that the studies of any branch of science is about what is already here. What exactly is Synthetic about the virology which is not from or based on any element not amongst us today? Nothing to do with creation is it?
My definition of 'life' is different from yours. For me even an atom is alive, does not stop to live in the body of the dead person. The components which make up life Life with your definition are very common in space and the best guess at the moment is that life developed around the volcanic vents in the sea.
Is there different definitions outside that which is life on earth? Is there life in space... seen none so far. Plenty of dust so where is the man and animals etc. You cannot look into space and say that the dust is dead bodies because even Moses knew the bodies return to dust. Does absolutely nothing when arguing the 'Creation' verses 'Evolution'
That there is no religion without God is your personal view. 500 million Buddhists, Jains and Hindus will not agree with that.
Christianity is the largest religion in the world if you give it the rightful place of being Jewish faith the covenant which God promised to bring in the number of Gentiles then all being Jews by the 3rd Covenant means that the largest will always be the Jewish faith. It is how we see truth and study facts. But the number which believes something is irrelevant to the truth the teachings contained within the bible compared to other faiths show that only by those chosen faiths who have covenants can we really receive answers which make sense. Look at history from Abraham till today. Did God not say? And has he not done? Truth wins hands down every time.
Ah, the 3 million Israelists wandering in Sinai for 40 years and leaving not even a shard of evidence for today's archaeologists! I have heard that story, and you want me to believe in this hocus-pocus?
A God who controlled all the elements of the earth including animals and even life and death.
What exactly would be difficult for him to provide for his people in a desert area for 40 years.
Look at Moses when he could not enter the Promise Land
7 And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died: his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated. Fit as a fiddle and he died. God kept him completely healthy as he did those who entered the promised Land.
You cannot accept the evidence he has left you how can you begin to know what evidence from the exodus from Egypt to the promised land would be acceptable as proof to you? The earth the creation all around you is proof that God exists. However you choose to try and disprove it, it remains as his words spoke through Moses and the books of the Torah.
"Mainstream scholarship no longer accepts the biblical Exodus account as history for a number of reasons. Most scholars agree that the Exodus stories were written centuries after the apparent setting of the stories."
Read the rest of the details at:
The Exodus - Wikipedia
When was this written and who by and based on what actual proven evidence and not opinion?
Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?
Bible exodus Red Sea crossing FOUND where Moses 'led Israelites into Saudi Arabia’
It is all about your choice of what you believe. The only answer when it comes to creation of life and the world is still "God did it".
whoops