• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

DECENCY, STATUES, AND GEORGE WASHINGTON – WHY TRUMP IS WRONG ABOUT THEM ALL

leibowde84

Veteran Member
“There were decent people on both sides”

Trump on Tuesday claimed that there were decent people on both sides of the conflict in Charlottesville, VA on Saturday. While it could be said that there were some indecent people in both groups using violence as a means of expression, it cannot be said that there were decent people amongst the Nazis, White Supremacists, White Nationalists and other Alt-Right groups.

This should be obvious because any decent person arriving in Charlottesville on Saturday, even if they were ignorant to the Nazi style “torch rally” the night before, would have instantly turned tail and ran when they saw who their fellow protesters were. There are, of course, plenty of decent people who feel strongly that Confederate statues should be left in place throughout the country. But, at a protest where outspoken and obvious members of the KKK and other White Supremacist groups are present, any decent minded, non-racist would have the fortitude to instantly pack up and leave, not wanting to be associated with such scum.

Thus, anyone who stayed and protested with known racists cannot honestly be considered “decent”, according to what the term actually means. Protesting alongside Nazis is a clear sign that a person puts their southern pride ahead of racial equality and honor.

“Confederate statues should be left in place”

Thursday, Trump sent a series of tweets condemning the removal of “beautiful” statues memorializing and praising members of the Confederacy. While it can certainly be said that not all Confederate soldiers and officers were bad people and were merely products of their time, the Confederacy itself was primarily based on keeping blacks in chains, making sure that their society was one that recognized them as being strictly and legally inferior to whites.

This can clearly be seen in the Cornerstone Address, an oration delivered by Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens at the Athenaeum in Savannah, GA on March 21, 1861. Stephens made clear what the principal goal and purpose of the secession and the Confederacy actually was:

Our new government is founded upon exactly [this] idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.

During and after reconstruction following the Confederacy’s loss in the Civil War, Confederate statues were placed throughout the South as a way for white racist leaders to make sure blacks knew their place. Regardless of the fact that they lost what they called the “War of Northern Aggression”, whites were still in charge. And, naming parks, buildings, roads and dedicating statues in prominent locations was their way of hammering in this shameful point.

Now, it is true that history should not be erased, and everyone should learn a lesson from the traitorous Confederacy and their subjugation of an entire race. That is why these statues belong in museums rather than in places of admiration, no matter how southerners feel about it. The mere fact that the Confederacy attacked our great nation as a band of racist traitors should be enough to avoid any praise of them. It’s time our children learned the truth about this part of American history. These statues are a reminder of the absolute horrors perpetrated by southern states during and prior to that time.

“If we take these statues down, who’s next … George Washington”

Trump’s comparison here is obviously ludicrous. It is true that Washington was a slave holder. But, the Confederate statues are not being removed simply because they depict men who owned slaves. They are being removed because they depict traitors to our young nation who fought a war, causing the deaths of over a million Americans, primarily to preserve the institution of slavery and the inferiority of black people.

George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were, indeed, slave holders who lived in southern states. But, they are founding fathers who never took up arms against us. They fought against a tyrannical king who taxed them without representation and treated colonists as lesser men and women. They were fighting for liberty rather than against it, and our country was born as a result. We celebrate them not for their owning of slaves, but for their courageous fight against oppression.

In short, men like Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, and Stonewall Jackson were traitors fighting for racial superiority in their culture. George Washington, on the other hand, was fighting against tyranny and a monarchy that refused to be reasonable and was guilty of atrocities where innocent men and women were murdered. All in all, the Confederacy lost for good reason, both tactically and morally, and that truth should be recognized.

Traitors who fought for racism should not be celebrated. They should be studied and learned from, but honoring them is a ludicrous proposition that has gone on for far too long. Let’s make a museum to the Confederacy and be done with it. And, if it upsets White Supremacist groups and those who choose to protest alongside them, we can be confident we are doing the right thing.


The reasoning behind Trump’s words should be obvious. I don’t think our President is a racist or White Nationalist. I think he is a Trump Supremacist. Anyone who is not as successful as he is not his equal … in his words, they are “losers”. His reasoning has to do with the fact that White Nationalists and White Supremacists support him, compliment him, and, most importantly, voted for him. As has been made entirely too clear, Trump is willing to befriend any group that expressly supports him. And, he will do whatever he can to make sure they aren’t offended out of fear of losing that support.

Now, some may say that all politicians think like this. But, that is incorrect. Courting voters is all too common and expected, but when it comes to the Alt-Right, White Supremacists, White Nationalists, Nazis, and the KKK, the vast majority of politicians would do the right thing. They would speak honestly and state the obvious when it comes to any White Supremacist group. There were certainly decent people on the side of the counter-protesters. They were standing up against racism, attempting to stick up for blacks, Jews, and immigrants … an undeniably honorable pursuit, for we saw in the 1930s what can happen when we don’t stand up to brown-shirt Nazi thugs. But, there were absolutely no decent people who chose to stay and protest marching alongside obvious and outspoken racists using actual Nazi insignia and slogans to profess their love for a group of traitors who fought and killed to keep slavery in place and make sure that black people knew their inferiority to whites.

It’s time for all Americans to recognize how despicable Trump’s words and sentiments were regarding the protests in Charlottesville. He has sold his soul in exchange for support from the most vile, evil, despicable and un-American citizens our country has to offer. We cannot forget and we cannot forgive him for this unless he specifically asks for our mercy … which we all know will never happen, as our President sees apologies as a sign of weakness.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I strongly feel that Jefferson, and Lee (and Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson and so on) are integral parts of US history and are as entitled to statues as any other figure prominent in history.

That they should be removed by some revisionist political correctness, is absurd.

But if Fascist dickheads are going to turn those statues into shrines to intolerance, then that has to be prevented, and takes priority over leaving the statues there.

Which is very much to be regretted, even if it's necessary.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
I strongly feel that Jefferson, and Lee (and Jefferson Davis and Stonewall Jackson and so on) are integral parts of US history and are as entitled to statues as any other figure prominent in history.

That they should be removed by some revisionist political correctness, is absurd.

But if Fascist dickheads are going to turn those statues into shrines to intolerance, then that has to be prevented, and takes priority over leaving the statues there.

Which is very much to be regretted, even if it's necessary.
I think it is very clear that is what the white supremacists are trying to do. And, we've seen how much violence is caused when they hold rallies. So, public safety concerns are reasonable.

But, why do you think that traitors to the U.S. should be honored with statues in the U.S.? Should Germany allow statues of Nazi leaders or generals? And, the Nazis weren't even traitors to Germany.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
No because then the KKK could show up anytime to undermine what the decent people were protesting. And that is probably the purpose of the KKK. The KKK came into existence after the confederates lost so they probably aren't confederates at all, the Union had the power and authority to allow them to exist. The purpose of the KKK is to undermine everything they claim to support. What the heck do Nazi's and confederates have to do with each other except they both lost?
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
No because then the KKK could show up anytime to undermine what the decent people were protesting. And that is probably the purpose of the KKK. The KKK came into existence after the confederates lost so they probably aren't confederates at all, the Union had the power and authority to allow them to exist. The purpose of the KKK is to undermine everything they claim to support. What the heck do Nazi's and confederates have to do with each other except they both lost?
Both the nazis and confederates were racist, and their primary goal was to support and retain white, anglo saxon superiority. And the KKK was absolutely, 100% started by southern people who were previously in the confederacy. How you were not aware of that is astounding?

The KKK was started literally with confederate soldiers to go around and rob, intimidate, kill and torture black families. Crack a book, buddy ... geeze.

(from http://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan)
Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders. Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s. After a period of decline, white Protestant nativist groups revived the Klan in the early 20th century, burning crosses and staging rallies, parades and marches denouncing immigrants, Catholics, Jews, blacks and organized labor. The civil rights movement of the 1960s also saw a surge of Ku Klux Klan activity, including bombings of black schools and churches and violence against black and white activists in the South.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
No because then the KKK could show up anytime to undermine what the decent people were protesting. And that is probably the purpose of the KKK. The KKK came into existence after the confederates lost so they probably aren't confederates at all, the Union had the power and authority to allow them to exist. The purpose of the KKK is to undermine everything they claim to support. What the heck do Nazi's and confederates have to do with each other except they both lost?
I'm sorry, but this might be the dumbest comment I've seen on this forum. The KKK was a group of confederate soldiers trying to make sure that black people were kept in submission to whites and did not achieve political equality. They were trying to keep black people in chains.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
The reasoning behind Trump’s words should be obvious. I don’t think our President is a racist or White Nationalist. I think he is a Trump Supremacist.
Would you claim that Trump is not a misogynist but, rather, a Trump Supremacist?

Being a pathological narcissist is no barrier to being a vulgar nativist white supremacist, and I do not understand the resistance to labeling him as such.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Would you claim that Trump is not a misogynist but, rather, a Trump Supremacist?

Being a pathological narcissist is no barrier to being a vulgar nativist white supremacist, and I do not understand the resistance to labeling him as such.
I just don't think Trump thinks like that. He seems to be more of a narcissist ... everything is about him. He is defending white supremacists and the alt-right because they like him. I bet if Kim Jung Un started praising Trump, Trump's rhetoric would do a 180.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
“There were decent people on both sides”

Trump on Tuesday claimed that there were decent people on both sides of the conflict in Charlottesville, VA on Saturday. While it could be said that there were some indecent people in both groups using violence as a means of expression, it cannot be said that there were decent people amongst the Nazis, White Supremacists, White Nationalists and other Alt-Right groups.

This should be obvious because any decent person arriving in Charlottesville on Saturday, even if they were ignorant to the Nazi style “torch rally” the night before, would have instantly turned tail and ran when they saw who their fellow protesters were. There are, of course, plenty of decent people who feel strongly that Confederate statues should be left in place throughout the country. But, at a protest where outspoken and obvious members of the KKK and other White Supremacist groups are present, any decent minded, non-racist would have the fortitude to instantly pack up and leave, not wanting to be associated with such scum.

Thus, anyone who stayed and protested with known racists cannot honestly be considered “decent”, according to what the term actually means. Protesting alongside Nazis is a clear sign that a person puts their southern pride ahead of racial equality and honor.

“Confederate statues should be left in place”

Thursday, Trump sent a series of tweets condemning the removal of “beautiful” statues memorializing and praising members of the Confederacy. While it can certainly be said that not all Confederate soldiers and officers were bad people and were merely products of their time, the Confederacy itself was primarily based on keeping blacks in chains, making sure that their society was one that recognized them as being strictly and legally inferior to whites.

This can clearly be seen in the Cornerstone Address, an oration delivered by Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens at the Athenaeum in Savannah, GA on March 21, 1861. Stephens made clear what the principal goal and purpose of the secession and the Confederacy actually was:

Our new government is founded upon exactly [this] idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.

During and after reconstruction following the Confederacy’s loss in the Civil War, Confederate statues were placed throughout the South as a way for white racist leaders to make sure blacks knew their place. Regardless of the fact that they lost what they called the “War of Northern Aggression”, whites were still in charge. And, naming parks, buildings, roads and dedicating statues in prominent locations was their way of hammering in this shameful point.

Now, it is true that history should not be erased, and everyone should learn a lesson from the traitorous Confederacy and their subjugation of an entire race. That is why these statues belong in museums rather than in places of admiration, no matter how southerners feel about it. The mere fact that the Confederacy attacked our great nation as a band of racist traitors should be enough to avoid any praise of them. It’s time our children learned the truth about this part of American history. These statues are a reminder of the absolute horrors perpetrated by southern states during and prior to that time.

“If we take these statues down, who’s next … George Washington”

Trump’s comparison here is obviously ludicrous. It is true that Washington was a slave holder. But, the Confederate statues are not being removed simply because they depict men who owned slaves. They are being removed because they depict traitors to our young nation who fought a war, causing the deaths of over a million Americans, primarily to preserve the institution of slavery and the inferiority of black people.

George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were, indeed, slave holders who lived in southern states. But, they are founding fathers who never took up arms against us. They fought against a tyrannical king who taxed them without representation and treated colonists as lesser men and women. They were fighting for liberty rather than against it, and our country was born as a result. We celebrate them not for their owning of slaves, but for their courageous fight against oppression.

In short, men like Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, and Stonewall Jackson were traitors fighting for racial superiority in their culture. George Washington, on the other hand, was fighting against tyranny and a monarchy that refused to be reasonable and was guilty of atrocities where innocent men and women were murdered. All in all, the Confederacy lost for good reason, both tactically and morally, and that truth should be recognized.

Traitors who fought for racism should not be celebrated. They should be studied and learned from, but honoring them is a ludicrous proposition that has gone on for far too long. Let’s make a museum to the Confederacy and be done with it. And, if it upsets White Supremacist groups and those who choose to protest alongside them, we can be confident we are doing the right thing.


The reasoning behind Trump’s words should be obvious. I don’t think our President is a racist or White Nationalist. I think he is a Trump Supremacist. Anyone who is not as successful as he is not his equal … in his words, they are “losers”. His reasoning has to do with the fact that White Nationalists and White Supremacists support him, compliment him, and, most importantly, voted for him. As has been made entirely too clear, Trump is willing to befriend any group that expressly supports him. And, he will do whatever he can to make sure they aren’t offended out of fear of losing that support.

Now, some may say that all politicians think like this. But, that is incorrect. Courting voters is all too common and expected, but when it comes to the Alt-Right, White Supremacists, White Nationalists, Nazis, and the KKK, the vast majority of politicians would do the right thing. They would speak honestly and state the obvious when it comes to any White Supremacist group. There were certainly decent people on the side of the counter-protesters. They were standing up against racism, attempting to stick up for blacks, Jews, and immigrants … an undeniably honorable pursuit, for we saw in the 1930s what can happen when we don’t stand up to brown-shirt Nazi thugs. But, there were absolutely no decent people who chose to stay and protest marching alongside obvious and outspoken racists using actual Nazi insignia and slogans to profess their love for a group of traitors who fought and killed to keep slavery in place and make sure that black people knew their inferiority to whites.

It’s time for all Americans to recognize how despicable Trump’s words and sentiments were regarding the protests in Charlottesville. He has sold his soul in exchange for support from the most vile, evil, despicable and un-American citizens our country has to offer. We cannot forget and we cannot forgive him for this unless he specifically asks for our mercy … which we all know will never happen, as our President sees apologies as a sign of weakness.
There are different ways to judge people.
Let's consider a couple....
A) Look at a group. Judge it's effect. Let this judgement apply to all within.
B) Look at an individual. Consider his beliefs & group memberships. Judge him by his actions.

You seem to lean towards A. I prefer B.
I can imagine that a white nationalist could be a law abiding productive citizen, despite advocating
things I dislike. But let's say we should condemn them all anyway because of their group membership.
What of the communists & socialists I know? They advocate systems which lead to deaths &
terrible oppression, but are also law abiding & productive. No, I won't condemn them. But I'll
argue with them.
Btw, I'm dining with a couple commies tomorrow.

Path A blinds people to individuality, & leads to prejudice & broad hatred.
It's a risky general approach to judgement....it reminds me of Nazis & the KKK.
 
Last edited:

leibowde84

Veteran Member
In what manner do you say Jefferson, or Lee, or Davis, or Jackson, resembles Hitler?
I would say that Thomas Jefferson doesn't belong in the list. He was not primarily fighting for white supremacy. Lee and Jackson could arguably be the same as someone like Rommel. But, Davis was just like Hitler. He was a traitor to the US who tried to start a new country based primarily on white supremacy and the enslavement of an entire race.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
There are different ways to judge people.
Let's consider a couple....
A) Look at a group. Judge it's effect. Let this judgement apply to all within.
B) Look at an individual. Consider his beliefs & group memberships. Judge him by his actions.

You seem to lean towards A. I prefer B.
I can imagine that a white nationalist could be a law abiding productive citizen, despite advocating
things I dislike. But let's say we should condemn them all anyway because of their group membership.
What of the communists & socialists I know? They advocate systems which lead to deaths &
terrible oppression, but are also law abiding & productive. No, I won't condemn them. But I'll
argue with them.

Path A blinds people to individuality, & leads to prejudice & broad hatred.
It's a risky general approach to judgement....it reminds me of Nazis & the KKK.
I think those at the rally, for example, should be judged by their actions. If they showed up at the rally and saw that nazis and white supremacists were marching with them, they had a choice to leave. Any decent person would have left. Especially if they knew that there was a nazi torch rally the night before. They consciously associated themselves with the nazis.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
“There were decent people on both sides”

Trump on Tuesday claimed that there were decent people on both sides of the conflict in Charlottesville, VA on Saturday. While it could be said that there were some indecent people in both groups using violence as a means of expression, it cannot be said that there were decent people amongst the Nazis, White Supremacists, White Nationalists and other Alt-Right groups.

This should be obvious because any decent person arriving in Charlottesville on Saturday, even if they were ignorant to the Nazi style “torch rally” the night before, would have instantly turned tail and ran when they saw who their fellow protesters were. There are, of course, plenty of decent people who feel strongly that Confederate statues should be left in place throughout the country. But, at a protest where outspoken and obvious members of the KKK and other White Supremacist groups are present, any decent minded, non-racist would have the fortitude to instantly pack up and leave, not wanting to be associated with such scum.

Thus, anyone who stayed and protested with known racists cannot honestly be considered “decent”, according to what the term actually means. Protesting alongside Nazis is a clear sign that a person puts their southern pride ahead of racial equality and honor.

“Confederate statues should be left in place”

Thursday, Trump sent a series of tweets condemning the removal of “beautiful” statues memorializing and praising members of the Confederacy. While it can certainly be said that not all Confederate soldiers and officers were bad people and were merely products of their time, the Confederacy itself was primarily based on keeping blacks in chains, making sure that their society was one that recognized them as being strictly and legally inferior to whites.

This can clearly be seen in the Cornerstone Address, an oration delivered by Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens at the Athenaeum in Savannah, GA on March 21, 1861. Stephens made clear what the principal goal and purpose of the secession and the Confederacy actually was:

Our new government is founded upon exactly [this] idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.

During and after reconstruction following the Confederacy’s loss in the Civil War, Confederate statues were placed throughout the South as a way for white racist leaders to make sure blacks knew their place. Regardless of the fact that they lost what they called the “War of Northern Aggression”, whites were still in charge. And, naming parks, buildings, roads and dedicating statues in prominent locations was their way of hammering in this shameful point.

Now, it is true that history should not be erased, and everyone should learn a lesson from the traitorous Confederacy and their subjugation of an entire race. That is why these statues belong in museums rather than in places of admiration, no matter how southerners feel about it. The mere fact that the Confederacy attacked our great nation as a band of racist traitors should be enough to avoid any praise of them. It’s time our children learned the truth about this part of American history. These statues are a reminder of the absolute horrors perpetrated by southern states during and prior to that time.

“If we take these statues down, who’s next … George Washington”

Trump’s comparison here is obviously ludicrous. It is true that Washington was a slave holder. But, the Confederate statues are not being removed simply because they depict men who owned slaves. They are being removed because they depict traitors to our young nation who fought a war, causing the deaths of over a million Americans, primarily to preserve the institution of slavery and the inferiority of black people.

George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were, indeed, slave holders who lived in southern states. But, they are founding fathers who never took up arms against us. They fought against a tyrannical king who taxed them without representation and treated colonists as lesser men and women. They were fighting for liberty rather than against it, and our country was born as a result. We celebrate them not for their owning of slaves, but for their courageous fight against oppression.

In short, men like Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, and Stonewall Jackson were traitors fighting for racial superiority in their culture. George Washington, on the other hand, was fighting against tyranny and a monarchy that refused to be reasonable and was guilty of atrocities where innocent men and women were murdered. All in all, the Confederacy lost for good reason, both tactically and morally, and that truth should be recognized.

Traitors who fought for racism should not be celebrated. They should be studied and learned from, but honoring them is a ludicrous proposition that has gone on for far too long. Let’s make a museum to the Confederacy and be done with it. And, if it upsets White Supremacist groups and those who choose to protest alongside them, we can be confident we are doing the right thing.


The reasoning behind Trump’s words should be obvious. I don’t think our President is a racist or White Nationalist. I think he is a Trump Supremacist. Anyone who is not as successful as he is not his equal … in his words, they are “losers”. His reasoning has to do with the fact that White Nationalists and White Supremacists support him, compliment him, and, most importantly, voted for him. As has been made entirely too clear, Trump is willing to befriend any group that expressly supports him. And, he will do whatever he can to make sure they aren’t offended out of fear of losing that support.

Now, some may say that all politicians think like this. But, that is incorrect. Courting voters is all too common and expected, but when it comes to the Alt-Right, White Supremacists, White Nationalists, Nazis, and the KKK, the vast majority of politicians would do the right thing. They would speak honestly and state the obvious when it comes to any White Supremacist group. There were certainly decent people on the side of the counter-protesters. They were standing up against racism, attempting to stick up for blacks, Jews, and immigrants … an undeniably honorable pursuit, for we saw in the 1930s what can happen when we don’t stand up to brown-shirt Nazi thugs. But, there were absolutely no decent people who chose to stay and protest marching alongside obvious and outspoken racists using actual Nazi insignia and slogans to profess their love for a group of traitors who fought and killed to keep slavery in place and make sure that black people knew their inferiority to whites.

It’s time for all Americans to recognize how despicable Trump’s words and sentiments were regarding the protests in Charlottesville. He has sold his soul in exchange for support from the most vile, evil, despicable and un-American citizens our country has to offer. We cannot forget and we cannot forgive him for this unless he specifically asks for our mercy … which we all know will never happen, as our President sees apologies as a sign of weakness.

An excellent summary of events, although many of the crimes that you're associating with the Confederacy can also be laid at the feet of the United States and its government. The Northern leaders had just as much to gain by pushing for reconciliation and allowing the former Confederate states to have their monuments and rewrite history as they see fit. The North allowed the KKK to run roughshod over the rights of people (and the KKK even made inroads and gained members among Northerners). The North allowed the Jim Crow laws and the lie of "Separate But Equal" to persist for over half a century before it was finally overturned.

The Civil War was a long time coming. It was inevitable. There were a few near misses in the decades preceding, when there could have been a secession and civil war. That's the period that bears the greatest need for examination. (I took a history course on the Civil War in college, but the professor spent so much time going over the pre-history of the Civil War that we never actually got to the Civil War itself.)

But the point is, the North is just as guilty as the South, so to use "The Confederacy" as some kind of scapegoat or sacrificial lamb to pay for all of America's sins tends to come off as disingenuous.

When the Bluecoats committed acts of genocide and other atrocities against Native Americans, were they holding Confederate flags? I don't think so. What flags were they holding, and aren't those the same flags flying over America today?

"Traitor" may be a bit hard to define here. Robert E. Lee and others might have argued that they were still loyal to their own states - which was a more important identification to people before the Civil War. People would give their loyalty to their states, and it was up to their state government to either remain loyal to the national government or not.

As some people sometimes say, "America - love it or leave it." The Confederate states said, "Okay, we're leaving it." But then, that begs the question of whether "leaving" a country is the same thing as "treason" against it.

The question of the legality of the secession was later settled after the war, but at the point when it started, they might have seen it simply as a parting of the ways. After all, "Brexit" is not considered treason against Europe, is it? When Scotland wanted to break off from the United Kingdom, was that treason?

As for Trump, you have a point here. I don't think Trump is acting very "presidential," although the trouble also seems to be due to the fact that a lot of Americans have trouble reconciling their own history and checkered past. We're all too ready to forgive Washington, Jefferson, et al. - merely because they weren't part of the Confederacy. After all, we don't want to trash all of our history and the foundation upon which this country was built. We want to keep all the "good" aspects while jettisoning the "evil" aspects of our past. We want to have our cake and eat it, too. That's what seems to be going on, beneath the surface.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
An excellent summary of events, although many of the crimes that you're associating with the Confederacy can also be laid at the feet of the United States and its government. The Northern leaders had just as much to gain by pushing for reconciliation and allowing the former Confederate states to have their monuments and rewrite history as they see fit. The North allowed the KKK to run roughshod over the rights of people (and the KKK even made inroads and gained members among Northerners). The North allowed the Jim Crow laws and the lie of "Separate But Equal" to persist for over half a century before it was finally overturned.
This is not entirely accurate. The KKK came around after the Federal Troops were taken out of the south during reconstruction. They should have remained there to enforce the rights of blacks to vote and keep electing black representatives. The North did not "allow" the KKK to run rampant. Southern lawmakers did. The North took the federal troops out in an effort to mend relations with the south.

But, that is neither here nor there. We now have the opportunity to remove these statutes that were, mainly, put up during the early 20th century in order to show black people who were still in charge.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I think those at the rally, for example, should be judged by their actions. If they showed up at the rally and saw that nazis and white supremacists were marching with them, they had a choice to leave. Any decent person would have left. Especially if they knew that there was a nazi torch rally the night before. They consciously associated themselves with the nazis.
This line of thought could be used to demonize just about anyone.
 
Top