Well may as well tell you for the good that it will do, I am sure it will go right past over your head.
Are you ready.... Marriage is the mixing of the genes of a man with the genes of a woman all the other paraphernalia is for the protection of the woman and the new born.
Marriage = mixing ..............simple no?
Depart from that one core principle and we are in trouble
You've defined what basic reproduction is, but not marriage. Marriage does not have anything to do with mixing of genes at all. That's biology dear. Reproduction easily occurs without marriage being involved and a marriage can exist without reproduction. If it was as you say, then any person that is infertile or does not wish to have children should not be allowed to get married and I can't believe you would actually be so cruel to actually think such a thing.
Yes sadly I was correct when I wrote that it would go right over your head.
It's not going over anyone's head but yours. You didn't define marriage. You defined how to combine DNA to produce offspring. That is not what a marriage is. Not to mention you couldn't seem to answer the question within the parameters set of not using gender as a factor.
All of you define marriage the way you want it to be and not what it actually is.
It's being described in both ways actually. Isn't what a person or a couple wants their marriage to be just as important as what it is perceived to be? If one does not have ideals of what makes a good marriage and what marriage means to them then why would anyone bother to get married? I think perhaps it is you who is greatly confused as to what a marriage is. Evidenced by your definition of biological reproduction instead of the institution of marriage.
example, oil does not marry (or mix) well with water, certain foods do not marry (or mix) well: in other words they do not create a third and more exiting flavour.
The joining of any two personalities creates their own unique "flavor"...that has nothing to do with reproduction though. Who are you to determine who "mixes" and who doesn't? Isn't that for the "ingredients" to determine?
Realistically marriage is also the extension of the mixing of the bride and groom families.
Or groom and groom, or bride and bride. Or even bride and grooms or groom and brides or brides and grooms for some people if that is what they feel constitutes a marriage.
We are living in a age of knowledge and technology explosion, but we have lost the true definition of love,
It appears you definitely have lost said definition. For you seem to think "love" is dependent upon "tab A" fitting into "slot B" and producing a whole new box. Personally, I think that's called knocking someone up and last I checked, love wasn't required for that and neither was marriage.
and apparently the true definition of marriage is also going out of the window, and why you may ask; if I tell you it will also go right over your head,
I'm beginning to wonder about your own height here as I think you might need to beehive your hair or something to catch what appears to go over yours.
and why is that? it is because our lifestyle is not in harmony with nature. I am sure it also will go right over your head.
In harmony with nature? How funny. Keep telling this Wiccan about being harmony with nature. Go ahead. Enlighten me.
So you have to keeping on searcing... well it is not all bad, it gives you something to hope for, and something to do. Good luck.
Perhaps you need to try to understand and take your own advice, considering how completely wrong you are. Good luck to you too.