dust1n
Zindīq
Yes, it's the same kind.
So, what two animals within the same kind do? Can they mate and have offspring? Is that what makes them their own kind?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yes, it's the same kind.
In your world view without a guide it's OK to torture babies for pleasure.
What do you think "verifiable evidence" is? Why is the information I have presented to you not "verifiable evidence" of evolution?
Are you reading the pages I've posted? How are fossils not verifiable? How are genetics and retroviral inserts not verifiable?
What do you think "verifiable evidence" actually is? What would "verifiable evidence" of evolution actually look like, to you?
I'm looking for verifiable evidence for change of kind, for example Ape to Human, we don't see that in the fossil record or anywhere because it never happened.
I've given you six websites full of information now. We clearly see in the fossil record a series of transitional forms shows human-like creatures with features akin to that of ancestral apes gradually changing as we ascend the geological strata. The genetic similarity between humans and contemporary apes also points at common ancestry, as does human chromosome 2 which shows clear signs of being the result of a fusion between two chromosome found in other apes, and the presence of dozens of endogenous retroviral inserts in our genetics that match identically with those of other contemporary apes accumulate to provide very conclusive evidence of common ancestry. Everything I have just told you about is observable, testable and verifiable.I'm looking for verifiable evidence for change of kind, for example Ape to Human, we don't see that in the fossil record or anywhere because it never happened.
we don't see that in the fossil record or anywhere because it never happened.
the truth as the scriptures say you would.
Still no verifiable evidence.
without a Biblical guide you can do anything you want, including being dishonest
Agreed there is no evidence at all for creation mythology being real
Waiting.
No Robert, dogs are a different species (kind) to foxes. Both have a common canine ancestor though, but no foxes are not dogs.The fox manipulated by man is still a dog after it's kind.
Humans are apes Robert.I'm asking for verifiable evidence of one change of kind to another, for example ape to human in the fossil record, or a half human half ape on film, it's been thousands of years and nobody has ever seen one, you would think with all our technology we would have seen one by now, hint, it never happened!
The so called evidence is huge, because the majority of the earth's population is choosing to suppress the truth as scripture says they would.
Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
Rom 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
Rom 1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an i
Many people claim there is more then imagination, fantasy, and mythology. It is those people who define the concept beyond this that run into trouble as we would like evidence beyond mythology.
Err . . . no it isn't, it isn't even close. Hell, they don't even belong to the same genus.The fox manipulated by man is still a dog after it's kind.
Hate to point out the elephant in the room Gambit - but if demanding scientific evidence of God is ridiculous, then positing a God must be ridiculous.