Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
See, the thing about this point made is that if people ate meat constantly, then animals would have easily been wiped out. Used as clothing, it does not take many deaths to create. In a land fertile with edible plants and fish, it would seem against reason for people to go out and hunt animals for consumption's sake unless there was a massive population boom and there was scarcity of food. We have teeth for grinding and a little for tearing, but even our teeth are primarily plant-based chewers. Since most humans would get sick from mauling an animal to death and eating it's flesh raw, I find that it seems highly unlikely that meat-eating is a natural application for our bodies. On the other hand, fish is edible raw, though simply more sanitary when cooked.
((Of course, I also don't believe in using a questionable book for historical outlooks, but that's just me))
What is wrong with my assertions? I can show you a number of different nutritional sites if you want, all stating that fruits and vegetables are meant to be the majority of the diet. There is very little requirement for meats. Now, fish are a requirement because they have Omega 3 fatty acids which are used by our bodies to promote brain function. Other meats have the other stuff, but not the brain food like fish. Doesn't that mean anything to you?I can't support your viewpoint. Not one sentence of it.
How about you?
What is wrong with my assertions? I can show you a number of different nutritional sites if you want, all stating that fruits and vegetables are meant to be the majority of the diet. There is very little requirement for meats. Now, fish are a requirement because they have Omega 3 fatty acids which are used by our bodies to promote brain function. Other meats have the other stuff, but not the brain food like fish. Doesn't that mean anything to you?
Sources? Fish is meat and healthy, and it is very well known that red meats and such are very bad for people.Okay....take aim at Adam and Eve.
As I read Genesis....Man is created as a species on Day Six.
There are no restrictions...no law...no names....
Everything is fair game.
I more than suspect this is also the time of Man's evolution.
Day Seven...the creation process stops. God rests.
But apparently Man was behaving too much like an animal.
Chapter Two happens after Day Seven.
It is not a retelling of Chapter One.
The events of Chapter Two have all the earmarks of a science experiment.
Adam is a chosen son of God.
Cloned and given his twin sister for a bride. Eve had no navel.
The Garden is only a very large petri dish.
Having altered Man's body...and his mind by the acquisition of knowledge...
Man is turned loose on the earth...in a new form.
But his teeth were not worked on.
Eating meat is something higher forms of life do....a lot.
That we now know our bodies can do well enough on less meat....
doesn't mean that Man was intended to do so on Day Six.
That you have canine teeth marks you as a meat eater.
Whether you participate or not.
Human canines are all but vestigial, Theif. Even if we had protruding snouts and a wide gape they'd be useless. And our incisors are just as handy for eating apples as they are for eating animals.
Our dentition, and the rest of our digestive system as well, reflects the fact that our hands have effectively become part of our food procurement and processing system, as well as the use of fire to cook food.
And you might also consider the teeth in his head.
Incisors and canines are for meat eating.
If he was vegetarian, his teeth would not be like ours.