Straw man. I said in full, "Co2 and methane gas, when introduced separately to the experiments at the rate thought to be caused by humans, each increased the temperatures 1 degree." One argument in circulation around the internets and political sphere is that the level of Co2 produced by humans (3-4%) isn't enough to create temperature changes. The MythBusters program rejected this claim on a micro-scale. All experiments still have variables, of course, but this does break through another bit of the "skeptics'" armor.
Eh, not really, The claim is that 3-4% is not a significant driver of temperature change.
This only convinces people who were already convinced. If you think that this shows anything meaningful, then I have a bridge to sell you.
Assuming they had the composition of air right, they did not have the system right. Le Chatlier Principle at work. Soil solubility, increased plant growth, shifting of CO2 consuming reactions to the left... they got none of that. Hell, they did not even have exposure to external energy done right.
And then there is this issue of scaling, which means that there results show nothing.
Funny thing is, the hole is shrinking due to human efforts to reduce CFC... but apparently humans can't do anything to Earth's climate, eh?
Ah yes, the claim I apparently made somewhere or the other. Oh wait, that's right, you are shoehorning words into my mouth.
Anyhow, ozone=/=climate.
Ozone absorbs UV rays. On another interesting note, the Montreal Protocols might not have done anything, as the hole over the Antarctic appears to be cyclical. It is irrelevant anyhow.
For heat? Yes it does. Gases are the primary (arguably only) composition of any and all ozone layers in the universe. Heat is "trapped" (simplification, obviously) as a consequence.
What the hell are you blabbering about?
The only thing that is present in the Ozone Layer is (drumroll please) Ozone. Good old O3. An unstable flavor of oxygen. So if ozone layers are present throughout the universe, there is oxygen present throughout the universe.
The notion of a "sealant" is absurd. A greenhouse gas does not "seal" heat in; it absorbs heat. When light strikes a CO2 molecule, the molecule absorbs the energy and has an increase in velocity (temperature). This velocity is imparted into the surroundings. There is no "sealant" at all. The only thing that prevents the atmosphere of the Earth from peeling right off is gravity.