lolBlasphemy comes ...
I remember you posting this same post a while ago.
Sorry, it is useless.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
lolBlasphemy comes ...
Your post doesn't have an argument in the first place!Calling a post useless without actually offering a counter argument is useless.
Your post doesn't have an argument in the first place!
lolNow if you wanted to look at least somewhat honorable and were at least concerned somewhat with people taking your posts remotely seriously, you'd say something a bit more like "I don't think your argument is correct" or "Here's why your argument is incorrect", but saying that I don't have an argument whatsoever is....well, a perfect example of how Trinitarians read things.
Is declaring that He is Son of God a blasphemy?
Never read the OT?
Your post doesn't have an argument in the first place!
Is declaring that He is Son of God a blasphemy?
It would appear it was but the Jews didn't take the declaration of being "son of God" to mean that he was their god in the flesh. It is blasphemous in Jewish and Muslim culture to associate "God" with having a son, consort, any sort of partners, or to make the claim that a person is equal with their god. It's evident that they made all sorts of charges against him that he tries to clear up. Their claims were baseless.
... which had nothing to do with what was being discussed.Why would there be an "argument"..? you asked the question....
He answered with a civil response by giving a definition....:sad:
doppelgänger;2656552 said:Dang, I haven't seen a person wrap this much ego up in a single discussion thread . . . ever! And still get nowhere even close to suitably answering the question posed in the OP.
Astounding.
... which had nothing to do with what was being discussed.
(Isaiah 64:8 [NIV]) Yet, O LORD, you are our Father. We are the clay, you are the potter; we are all the work of your hand.
(Malachi 2:10 [NIV]) Have we not all one Father? Did not one God create us?
(John 5:17-18 [NIV]) Jesus said to them, "My Father is always at his work to this very day, and I, too, am working." For this reason the Jews tried all the harder to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.
(John 19:6-7 [NIV]) As soon as the chief priests and their officials saw him, they shouted, "Crucify! Crucify!" But Pilate answered, "You take him and crucify him. As for me, I find no basis for a charge against him."The Jews insisted, "We have a law, and according to that law he must die, because he claimed to be the Son of God."
The concept in Islam is different though.
... not in the context of the whole discussion.Actually it was.....
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/2655915-post5040.html
I am not following.And I don't disagree which is why I said (" It's evident that they made all sorts of charges against him that he tries to clear up. Their claims were baseless.")
It is only the physical meaning there.If Yeshua or his followers were claiming that he was the physical "son of God" then the concept is no different...
Actually, giving arguments like this:doppelgänger;2656588 said:This is getting comical.
I am not following.
It is only the physical meaning there.
... not in the context of the whole discussion.