Do you insist on looking that desperate?
You claimed it was present (like eimi). Though it has nothing to do with the topic.
Again, throwing useless words.
(Try not to look that desperate)
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Did Jesus say he was God???
- Thread starter Muffled
- Start date
You claimed it was present (like eimi). Though it has nothing to do with the topic.
Again, throwing useless words.
(Try not to look that desperate)
Last edited:
Shermana
Heretic
Huh? I said that its used as Present tense with Asahel's "He answered: I am", and that its past tense when indicated by the use of Genesthai for "Was". The point of the Aorist tense is that its consistent with the indicator's tense.
And once again, if Jesus said "I am G-d", that makes no sense whatsoever to the context of the accusation or the response. Not only that but its more Modalist than Trinitarian.
And once again, if Jesus said "I am G-d", that makes no sense whatsoever to the context of the accusation or the response. Not only that but its more Modalist than Trinitarian.
Go play around or learn to read Greek then come for a discussion.
Dirty Penguin
Master Of Ceremony
outhouse
Atheistically
NOPE
Incorrect.
A unknown author may have eluded to it as that is all you have to go on. Even then its very iffy.
And what I gave goes perfectly with context.Context is king....
Talk about useless posts.
not nom
Well-Known Member
what? you snipped of the point, and offered *nothing* in your reply. or are you referring to the post I'm just quoting? it is devoid of anything, it just serves to dismiss something without dealing with it. it's an expression of forfeit, are you aware of that?
"go learn to read greek", lol. your argument is that because they used to translate "you are" as "you are god" from the greek version of the psalms (who cares about those, anyway? aren't there hebrew manuscripts?), that it also has to mean the same in john.
that's not an argument, that's hilarious.
Try to read the context of the posts before replying...
not nom
Well-Known Member
I did. now, if you can't answer anything to the points made, why answer at all?
being silent means you have no argument. what you do instead, means you have no argument and suck. so how does that help?
outhouse
Atheistically
why? because you cannot begin to refute it?
How could we ever know what jesus said if her never wrote a single word and those that did never knew or met him or heard a word pass the mans lips.
The man was so unimportand while he was alive not a single historian or scholar of the time jotted down a sentance or word about the man.
not nom
Well-Known Member
is that before or after breakfast?
One argument was off topic and baseless and the other was replied to before.
It would be better to read the context before jumping in a discussion and attacking people.
As I told you before, when you give something smart, you'll deserve a reply.
Jeremy Mason
Well-Known Member
That's news to me. I thought he was in his early to mid thirties.
not nom
Well-Known Member
you didn't deal with that. the way you deal with things, by "it's been dealt with" might just mean "that has already been ignored before by claiming it's been dealt with".