Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Let's be serious; you see that **** on stickers plastered on the backs of coal-rolling lift-kitted pickup trucks all the time, along with addled boomers constantly spamming it on Facebook.No such thing.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Let's be serious; you see that **** on stickers plastered on the backs of coal-rolling lift-kitted pickup trucks all the time, along with addled boomers constantly spamming it on Facebook.No such thing.
That's nothing compared to:Sounds like clear observation to me.
Watch this, if you can handle it:
That's an odd way to spell reality.At least we know to avoid extreme Liberal propaganda.
Except that nobody has condoned or tried to justify the violence and vandalism, nor were the protests against police misconduct an attempt to defy democracy.
I disagree, many people justified BLM violence! Corporations lined up to fund the “shakedown” con artist who made millions!Except that nobody has condoned or tried to justify the violence and vandalism, nor were the protests against police misconduct an attempt to defy democracy.
That's nothing compared to:
What a dopey imbecile. He's not fit to clean toilets, much less run the country. It's super embarrassing that anyone takes him seriously.
Provide a legal definition first.Definitions have been provided you.
So the question is...
Are you denying that insurrection happened?
Edited--therefore not credible.That's nothing compared to:
What a dopey imbecile. He's not fit to clean toilets, much less run the country. It's super embarrassing that anyone takes him seriously.
Reality can often be odd.That's an odd way to spell reality.
And those who instigated it all are living in multiple mansions instead of prison.I disagree, many people justified BLM violence! Corporations lined up to fund the “shakedown” con artist who made millions!
This has been explained to you many times. "Insurrection" is not a criminal term. You will not find a legal definition for it. It is a pity that you can't understand the Constitution since it does not use legal terms.Provide a legal definition first.
Edited--therefore not credible.
It's not whataboutism when you're comparing mental cognition.And of course, a whataboutism.
So what you're saying is that reality has a liberal bias?Reality can often be odd.
Would you please, like, come up with the legal definition of "insurrection" that we're supposed to be clinging to here?
an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government
LMAO! You just admitted that your video was completely worthless. It was heavily edited. In those videos the idiocy of Trump was left almost whole. They let him ramble on and on making sure that people knew, "Yes, Trump really believes that ****." Your source had to pick out seconds at a time instead of minutes at a time.Edited--therefore not credible.
And of course, a whataboutism.
Then continuing to use a non-criminal term to describe a "crime" is a losing argument, and you have lost.This has been explained to you many times. "Insurrection" is not a criminal term. You will not find a legal definition for it. It is a pity that you can't understand the Constitution since it does not use legal terms.
Liberalism has a bias against reality.So what you're saying is that reality has a liberal bias?
I'll tolerate your desire to believe as you wish.LMAO! You just admitted that your video was completely worthless. It was heavily edited. In those videos the idiocy of Trump was left almost whole. They let him ramble on and on making sure that people knew, "Yes, Trump really believes that ****." Your source had to pick out seconds at a time instead of minutes at a time.
Except I can and have supported my claims. You can only find articles that refute you or are written by incredibly prejudiced sources.I'll tolerate your desire to believe as you wish.
Wrong again. Even you know that drunk driving is wrong (I hope). It is illegal. But drunk driving is not a criminal term. The same applies to the insurrection.Then continuing to use a non-criminal term to describe a "crime" is a losing argument, and you have lost.