• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Do people ask the wrong questions in regards to philosophy and religion?

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
Philosophy and religion are two fields of human inquiry that deal with some of the most fundamental and profound questions of existence, such as: What is the meaning of life? What is the nature of reality? What is the origin and purpose of the universe? What is the source and standard of morality? What happens after death?

These questions are important and worthy of exploration, but are they the right questions to ask? Or are they based on some assumptions or biases that limit our understanding and perspective?

In this post, I will suggest that many people ask the wrong questions in philosophy and religion, and suggest some ways to improve our questioning skills.

One reason why people ask the wrong questions in philosophy and religion is that they often confuse their subjective opinions or preferences with objective facts or truths. For example, some people may ask: Which religion is the true one? Which philosophical system is the most rational one? Which ethical theory is the most moral one? These questions imply that there is only one correct answer to these matters, and that anyone who disagrees with it is wrong or irrational. However, I actually feel that these questions are not based on empirical evidence or logical reasoning, but on personal beliefs or values. So, a better way to ask these questions might be: Why do I believe that this religion is true? How do I justify this philosophical system as rational? What are the criteria and consequences of this ethical theory?

Another reason why people ask the wrong questions in philosophy and religion is that they often overlook or ignore the complexity and diversity of human experience and knowledge. For example, some people may ask: How can God allow evil and suffering in the world? How can free will exist if everything is determined by natural laws or divine will? How can we know anything for certain if we are limited by our senses and reason? These questions assume that there is a simple or clear-cut answer to these issues, and that any contradiction or paradox is a problem or flaw. However, I feel these questions do not take into account the multiple perspectives or dimensions that may actually be involved in these topics. So, a better way to ask these questions would be: How do different religions or philosophies explain or cope with evil and suffering? How do different theories or models account for free will and determinism? How do different methods or sources of knowledge deal with uncertainty and doubt?

So, I think that many people ask the wrong questions in philosophy and religion because they are influenced by their own biases or prejudices, or by their lack of awareness or appreciation of the richness and diversity of human thought and experience. I think that we can improve our questioning skills by being more open-minded and curious, by being more critical and reflective, and by being more humble and respectful. By asking better questions, we may not find definitive answers, but we may discover new insights, possibilities, or connections that can enrich our lives and understanding. In my opinion.

I had a slight change in perspective recently myself - just today - which made me contemplate these questions.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Does that mean you're in favor of dialog / discussion /dialectic / debate... ?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
or by their lack of awareness or appreciation of the richness and diversity of human thought and experience. I think that we can improve our questioning skills by being more open-minded and curious

This sounds like an approach that actually would support diversity (of thought) - hoo-ray!!
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
The new bloke on the street of Northern Ireland gets asked:
"Are you a Catholic or a Protestant?"
"Actually, I'm an atheist."
"Yeah, but are you a Catholic or a Protestant atheist?"

Sometimes, to find the right question, one has to think out of the box. But often, like in the above example, the interlocutor is unable to leave the box.

Agnosticism is a way to think out of the box / ask the right question. Instead of bickering over the existence or non existence it asks what a god even is and how we know. For me, reading the full definition of Agnosticism "the existence or nature of god(s)" struck me as a way to think out of the box. But not everyone feels as enlightened as I felt by the bolded words.

So, if we think we have a better question, we need a way to lead people out of the box. (I clearly have to work on that.)
 

Yerda

Veteran Member
I think the best question one can ask regarding philosophy and religion is this: how can I make myself a better person? It cuts through the less important stuff. Your mileage may vary.
Agreed. Links in with the Big Project type questions too, like how can we as a group (religion, party, society) imrprove the world (or our little bit of it) for everyone. Has to start with being a better person.
 

Kfox

Well-Known Member
Agnosticism is a way to think out of the box / ask the right question. Instead of bickering over the existence or non existence it asks what a god even is and how we know.
Agnosticism does no ask any of those questions, it assumes a God like the Christian God and makes claims based on those assumptions.
 

JustGeorge

Imperfect
Staff member
Premium Member
I guess that depends on what answers one wants to uncover.

Sometimes I think there's too much focus on answers, and not enough enjoying of the ride. Things are so personal with religion and philosophy... what satisfies one won't satisfy another.
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
I guess that depends on what answers one wants to uncover.

Sometimes I think there's too much focus on answers, and not enough enjoying of the ride. Things are so personal with religion and philosophy... what satisfies one won't satisfy another.

I see. This is where it gets interesting, because I feel that philosophy often doesn't provide answers, but questions.

So in the case of philosophy, I'm not sure that asking the right questions would even get answers. But maybe it would get better questions.
 
Top