Audie
Veteran Member
The Bible agrees with science. The Bible supports the earth being round.
IF it said that, which is nowhere does,
It would be about the only place the "Bible"
got something rihht.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Bible agrees with science. The Bible supports the earth being round.
IF it said that, which is nowhere does,
It would be about the only place the "Bible"
got something rihht.
That’s just not true. 40 different techniques of radiometric dating corroborate each other.I think there's just much radiometric dating evidence that supports the young earth as there is that supports the earth being old. Evidences of a Recent Creation
That’s your faith.Everything in Genesis is a fable
a circle is not a sphere.Isaiah 40:22 mentions the circle of the earth.
That’s just not true. 40 different techniques of radiometric dating corroborate each other.
Christians have been taught that God wrote the Bible so it’s difficult to face its errors.If a person goes to a crap woo woo site
for science, they will get lies. Simple.
That our friends have to resort to such for
"facts" to support their bible-readin' is pathetic.
That’s your faith.
No, as to the Earth floating in space, it does not say that. That is a reinterpretation. It also says that the Earth rests on pillars. You can't count the near hits if you ignore the clear misses.The Bible also says that the earth free floats in space and the stars are innumerable and the life is in the blood.
And what might be. Magic?Radiometrics doesn't rule it out as a logical possibility.
He has faith and recognizes it as a weakness. The only defense is to accuse others of his weakness.Why do you insist on calling it "faith"?
Other than some semantics / equivocation gam
He has faith and recognizes it as a weakness. The only defense is to accuse others of his weakness.
Please do not link to lying sources that are so idiotic that they do not even know the plural of "evidence".I think there's just much radiometric dating evidence that supports the young earth as there is that supports the earth being old. Evidences of a Recent Creation
Again, lying sources do not help you. That verse claims that the Earth is flat.Isaiah 40:22 mentions the circle of the earth. Isaiah 40-22 circle sphere - creation.com
Because some aspects of Genesis could be true but you claim emphatically that it’s all false. That would be faith.Why do you insist on calling it "faith"?
Other than some semantics / equivocation gam
Its a special usage for creationists.Please do not link to lying sources that are so idiotic that they do not even know the plural of "evidence".
Faith isn’t a weakness, it’s just faith. Atheist have a kind of faith in a Godless universe.He has faith and recognizes it as a weakness. The only defense is to accuse others of his weakness.
Because some aspects of Genesis could be true but you claim emphatically that it’s all false. That would be faith.
We are not amused by equivocation games.Faith isn’t a weakness, it’s just faith. Atheist have a kind of faith in a Godless universe.