Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
haha.... so the gang-mentatlity begins to form does it. First know your enemy, attack him, and then you find your friends. We all have to have an enemy do we? That is how we off load our own problems onto others and bond with those around us... wonderfulYou are not alone.
Then you have not framed it correctly. Because there was a definite change in the statement from one insult in gest, to an insult not in guest. My grammer is not brilliant, but if I have to I will look it up.
I don't like bullies. If you don't want to discuss, go away! Troll!
I have given evidence to the contrary.
So? Every government starts with the many and then deals with the few.
You are vulgar to the extreme. But a clever ploy. You turn mens machoness onto themselves, so now, to be tough, they have to be weak. Clever. Are they to dumb to work that out where you are, or do they just want a peaceful life. Manipulating women, like I say.
No one is saying that an abusive relationship should be endured if all else fails.
By your own admition, you don't. If you did you would not be arguing with me. To understand it , you would have to be able to discern it, and you can't, as you don't belong to the lord. That is obvious.
Hi Robert.....
The last statement says you are a misandrist.
What makes you think it is ugly. I think Muslim women are wonderful with their dress.
I can only answer these questions with the experience I have gained from my own culture(U.S.) but believe that all humans should have the right to pursue their dreams and live their lives the way they want to free from oppression, free to believe, chose and love. Society is changing Robert. Women have the right to vote and work and do anything a man can do (better or worse makes no difference.) There is really nothing you can do about it so you might want to buckle up because it is going to be a bumpy ride for you. You can climb the rooftops and yell at the women to go back home and make babies and take care of them but judging by the reactions from this thread, not very many people are going to do as you say.
I would guess not very many.
Children seem to be doing just fine.
Yes and you have been getting lots of opinions but do you not see your own bigotry in this situation?
No, not intimidated by men at all. As I'm equal to them why should I be intimidated by them? Unless, of course, you want to argue that women should be intimidated by the "stronger sex"?
She asks a question and she is "playing games"? Rather than accuse her of "playing games" why don't you actually just answer her question? A question you have refused to answer for her for a while now.
Oh, and is the sacrifice a female doctor makes to become a doctor not worth the same as the sacrifice a man makes to become one? Is her sacrifice not a good one? The lives she may save? The contributions to the field of medicine not as much as a man's? If she develops the cure for a deadly disease it should be looked down upon her for doing such because what she really should have been doing is raising babies at home rather than saving thousands or even millions of lives with her cure? We should sacrifice lives because you would rather females stay home and raise children they may or may not have even though those children may already be well looked after by their fathers or other relation while these females dare to hold jobs?
So to you, all women must be responsible for continual child care, regardless of if they even have any, regardless of if their children are or can be looked after by anyone else, regardless of if their children are teens and can care for themselves for some hours after school while their mother works, regardless of if her children are grown and have left the nest so to speak? A woman should not work outside the home even if she is divorced, if she is widowed, if she is single?
This is just tripe. I think you know that.
Do you not get it, after it has been explained to you time and time again, that this "greater job" is something that is being done by both parents? Men are just as responsible for their children and how they are raised as women. Or do you just want to ignore the role men play in their families?
Do you not see that this is men's responsibility as well? Not just women?
Why is it that everyone else here isn't expressing an opinion, but being a "bully" to you? You do not see that perhaps you are the one in the bullying position? The one shaking their finger, admonishing all women for daring to have their own dreams, for being so bold as to contribute to their household, for trying to survive and not let their children starve or go without? You, the judgmental one, the scorning one, the one who thinks they know better for half the world's population?
It would be nice if someone did.
Thankyou, I will try and extent the same courtesy... though I am not promising
But with laws governing us, right? Are you saying complete anarchy? I guess not. So laws and rules. So I ask, whose laws? Obviously not mine.
I had noticed
that does not make it right.Just because something is happening which seems irreversible and yet wrong, does not mean I should not point that out. We could have said the same in the UK when women wanted the vote, could we not.
Bigotry is to have an opinion that you stick to... stick to becasue you think it is right. By the way, I am not saying women go home and make babies. I am saying women WORK from home, including bringing up the children to a far higher level of social skills than they have now, so we don't have deliquents running round. I have given evidence for the crime statistics being worse under single parent families, and I have given some evidence of feminism being the root course of it.... pretty much acknowledged before at any rate by feminists themselves, as they went out soley to destroy the family. Why? Because that was the power of the man. Society does not benefit. With smaller learning facilities, we would not have the bullying that we see in large schools with mixed gender, which even leads sometimes to rape, rape of a teacher for one. None of that would happen if they did not have such large impersonal schools. Long story. Not going into it all unless your interested.
Sarcastic wording and trolling I would have said.
I will do that if try to understand a little deeper before you post, okay?
That's not quite what I meant, but now that you mention it... have you never known boys and girls schools? Where are you from? That is how it used to be, even in my time. Now we get the usual harassing with the genders mixed. Do you not care about these children or something? Or are you still trolling.
