I read a quote recently, although I can't recall where, that a [theistic] Satanist or Luciferian must first be a Christian.
Presumably because a belief in Satan and/or Lucifer goes hand in hand with a belief in God and probably Jesus too.
What are your thoughts on this idea?
Sure, yes; generally.
But it's all so messed up, isn't it? Some say Lucifer isn't Satan, defying most who say they are the same being, then others remind us Lucifer was a Roman god and consort of Venus, the goddess of Love, then others say Freemasons worship Lucifer and if they do then they can't all be Christians, since they are not all Christians...etc etcetera....
Jews and Muslims have varying beliefs about Satan, he's in their Scriptures; but how can a belief in Satan/Lucifer be
theistic when he is NOT A GOD? He is, as the Muslims, Jews and Christians say - a FALLEN ANGEL, that is a created being, not a god. Yet for him to be worshipped as God or a god, this would then mean that one would not have to be a Christian or believe in Christ, because their Scriptures don't support the idea of Lucifer/Satan as a deity. Right?
Basically, it's musing over questions like this that made a nonsense of Catholicism for me. Nothing adds up...
Paradise Lost and other Middle-Ages folk tales are more responsible for the identification of Lucifer with Satan than the oft-quoted passages in Isaiah.
But then the Roman Christians had already demonized him as the consort of the goddess, a pagan icon, so...it was perhaps natural to ID him as the Devil? OK, but the question remains; is that very Christian in essence?
So I guess, in closing, the answer is the same; generally if one puts Lucifer/Satan on the pedestal as a god or The God, then one would generally take his story from the Christian tradition, but not necessarily be a Christian.
Perhaps the best thing would be for Lucifer/Satan to be the archetypal God-figure in a new religion devoid of Abrahamic mythology.