It's frustrating educating mature people about the basic facts of the Bible. first thing is, the Bible is all about Jesus Christ (who is the One true creator God).
I assure you that I'm not wholly unfamiliar with the bible, and that I can assert with great confidence that Jesus is mentioned nowhere in the Tanakh. Claims to the contrary appear to be uniformly Christian in origin, due to the practice of the gospel authors describing their respective versions of Jesus doing this or that in order to be able to claim that this was foretold in the Tanakh. A very straightforward example is the author of Matthew seating Jesus across BOTH a colt and a donkey (if you call it an ***, the autocensor here will instead print ***) in Matthew 21:7 so he can "fulfill" Zechariah 9.9. (In Mark 11:7 and Luke 19:35 he rides just a colt.)
lSecondly, He came into the world as fully man and fully God at the same time. His mission was to atone for the sins of His Elect, as a man. He didn't cheat His way out of feeling pain and sorrow and every other human thing.
The earthly origins of the Jesus of Paul can only be guessed at (though he's said to be descended from David), but since Paul's Jesus (like John's) shows Gnostic influences ─ in particular, pre-existing in heaven with God and creating the material universe, like the Gnostic demiurge ─ we can distinguish those two versions of Jesus from those of Mark (an ordinary Jewish male, not even descended from David, but then adopted by God as [his] son following baptism by JtB) and of Matthew and Luke (born by the divine insemination of a virgin) and descended from David by two fake genealogies which are irreconcilable, the one against the other, and anyway for Joseph, very specifically NOT the father of Jesus.
No mention of "His Elect" anywhere.
And as I said (and you can have the quotes if you wish) all five versions of Jesus deny that they're God and never claim to be God. So if Jesus was in fact God, his entire mission was built on an extremely gross falsehood.
So, you have been hoodwinked into believing there's more than one Jesus Christ.
I simply read the NT. If I say something the NT doesn't say, I identify it as such.
It seems a weird waste of time to you that God, enjoys praise and worship. He is a jealous God, He doesn't tolerate those who don't put Him first in all things.
So [he]'s just a petty human by nature, a Trump figure, who somehow doesn't look like a first century Jewish peasant from the Levant, more like Arnie, right? As for being jealous, that jealousy was aimed at the other gods in the Canaanite pantheon back in [his] henotheist days ie before Isaiah.
The last question doesn't make any sense, as there is no such thin as nothing
The claim is that God is omniscient. Do you accept that claim, or is omniscience not a quality of your God?
If God is to be omniscient, there must be a way for [him] to be certain there's nothing [he] doesn't know [he] doesn't know.
If omniscience is a quality of the God you speak of, by why process has [he] determined there's nothing [he] doesn't know [he] doesn't konw?