• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does any supernatural god exist?

Does any supernatural god exist?

  • Certainly

    Votes: 14 34.1%
  • Certainly not

    Votes: 9 22.0%
  • Certainly don't know

    Votes: 18 43.9%

  • Total voters
    41

Ajax

Active Member
It’s not an error.

If that’s what God believes it is a correct statement.

To say that slave owners in the south is an error would be false because they did.
No, it's not that simple.. Accepting slavery and giving instructions that people can treat them as property and beat them up is the error.
Whether that is right or wrong is a moral judgement and God does not follow our morals any more than you would follow an ants.
So you mean that we as humans can not have a moral judgement about God? In fact you say that people should throw out of window their morality and follow God orders about morality, right? Because you wrote that "what God believes is a correct statement".
If that is the case, and our morality is out of the window, how do you know and claim that God is moral???? :shrug:
The same applies to the authors of the Bible.
 
Last edited:

Ajax

Active Member
Where is the error?
The error is that god declared killing/murder an abomination, but he killed/murdered far more than two million people, because for example he changed his mind for creating people before the flood, despite being him who created them in this way and despite being presented as omniscient.
 

ChieftheCef

Well-Known Member
Just saying slavery is actually wrong. Can't believe I had to say that.

The economics of it are just bunk. Slavery gives lots of money to a smaller number of people than freed slaves into the miasma of economics that with freed slaves and their cultures and their eventual found religions and other economic booms would give to more others and thus develope the common force of all things, the underlying principle, making the most of nothing, efficiency. Basically we get more benefit from no slaves, from less other comes greater boons.

This is because this is all Nature is doing. She is economizing. She is finding niches, jobs, for everything. For mutualism, she is creating and benefitting mutualism in nature sheerly by her nature of which is at 10-20%. For commensalism, she is finding benefit without harming anyone. 5-10%. They get away unscathed. And parasitism, where the other is detrimental is 30-40%. 20% are chemotorphs, those that live off chemicals. Most plants don't get eaten. Most plants eat poop and sunlight. They sometimes die, etc. She does all this because she has to, but doesn't benefit those who do not help others as much. Be a tree. Don't do it for yourself, do it for others.

And as you get more and more stable complexity you grow yourself more and more until you are as proud as Ancient Egypt.
 

Ajax

Active Member
The sad reality is humans cannot communicate with nature in any way.
They can not communicate with God either. They say that If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.
Nature hates humans and seek to kill us at every opportunity. Just google how many people are killed by animals and nature every year, it will blow your mind
Certainly far less than your God, when he killed all humans, including animals and plants for no reason whatsoever in the supposed flood, just because he changed his mind about what and how he created them, despite also being omniscient, thus knowing that people will become exactly the same again.:laughing:
 
Last edited:

PearlSeeker

Well-Known Member
Didn't read before posting, I didn't insert the word "not" between the bit were I said. "If secular historians found that the bible is "NOT" historically accurate I would burn my bible"
But sadly for you, I get the last laugh as nobody has found a single error in the entire bible
I read it as you wrote. This is exactly the point. If Bible is historically accurate you would burn it. Before you said it is accurate. So burn it.
 

Tinkerpeach

Active Member
Just to remind you you forgot to answer a few of my questions...

:)
The Bible doesn’t begin with the Spirit of God hovering over a gently flowing stream (that is later) or a peaceful, calm sea (again, later). It begins with the Spirit of God hovering over a double image of water. Two words are used to describe this chaotic, pre-created sea: “the deep” (tehom) and “the waters” (mayim).

Mayim is just the plural form of the word for “water.” However, tehom will have a negative connotation almost every other time it appears in the Bible [see for yourself]. That is why it is sometimes translated in English as “the abyss.” The abyss is where the floodwaters come from in Genesis 7. It is where Job’s leviathan lives (Job 41). It is the place the Israelites fled through to escape the Egyptians (and then the place where the Egyptians were drowned when they tried to follow (Exodus 15). It is the waters of the grave that live beneath the earth (Psalm 71).

So the “primeval sea” is the uncreated state, the chaos that preceded God’s ordering of creation as described in Genesis 1. These are the waters of uncreation where no life can flourish, no meanings can take root, no order can take shape. It is the opposite of the good place God is about to bring about as the first chapter of Genesis unfolds.

God is never depicted doing things unilaterally. It was the Israelites who couldn't fight against chariots of iron, not God. Why couldn't they? Because they got scared and didn't trust that God would empower them to do even this. The book of Joshua ends with the land not being fully conquered in spite of God's commandment, and therefore the remaining nations serving as a thorn in Israel's side from then on. God's promise not being entirely fulfilled due to the unfaithfulness of Israel rather than because of God being weak is a theme throughout the whole Bible... This is the point behind the blessing and the curse in the Law.

Anything else?
 

McBell

Unbound
According to the Bible, God killed/murdered more than two million people. What was again this sixth commandment?
The problem here is that they will claim that we mere mortal humans cannot hold God to his own declared morality because ....something.

This is simply because if we were to hold God to his declared moral system, he would epically fail.
And since God is perfectly perfect, he can not be wrong.

Which makes it a rather interesting conundrum for them when the slavery issue is brought up.
 

Sand Dancer

Currently catless
It is estimated that there are some 320 million gods, but there is only One Supernatural God who claims to have created everything that exists. We have documented records of the God who made the claim. We don't have any evidence to suggest that any of the others gods exist outside of our imagination.
There are quite a few creator gods.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
You have got to be kidding.

There's no actual history apart from some names and locations.

There are no known authors.

The mythological stories about talking snakes, magical fruit, talking donkeys, wooden ships holding the entire world's animal population, raising the dead, people who live several centuries old , blowing down walls with horns, keeping the sun still by raising one's arms, furnaces that don't burn people inside a fire, floating swords, throwing down rods that turns into snakes, magical mana from heaven, long magical hair that gives superhuman strength, turning water into wine, feeding a mass crowd with a few fish, magically walking on water..... need I continue?

Not in real life nor real history. That's for sure.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Thus far I've seen neither convincing evidence nor an explanatory need for a God. Nor have I found any claimants who've met their burden.
 

Tinkerpeach

Active Member
Just to remind you you forgot to answer a few of my questions...

:)
The Bible doesn’t begin with the Spirit of God hovering over a gently flowing stream (that is later) or a peaceful, calm sea (again, later). It begins with the Spirit of God hovering over a double image of water. Two words are used to describe this chaotic, pre-created sea: “the deep” (tehom) and “the waters” (mayim).

Mayim is just the plural form of the word for “water.” However, tehom will have a negative connotation almost every other time it appears in the Bible [see for yourself]. That is why it is sometimes translated in English as “the abyss.” The abyss is where the floodwaters come from in Genesis 7. It is where Job’s leviathan lives (Job 41). It is the place the Israelites fled through to escape the Egyptians (and then the place where the Egyptians were drowned when they tried to follow (Exodus 15). It is the waters of the grave that live beneath the earth (Psalm 71).

So the “primeval sea” is the uncreated state, the chaos that preceded God’s ordering of creation as described in Genesis 1. These are the waters of uncreation where no life can flourish, no meanings can take root, no order can take shape. It is the opposite of the good place God is about to bring about as the first chapter of Genesis unfolds.

God is never depicted doing things unilaterally. It was the Israelites who couldn't fight against chariots of iron, not God. Why couldn't they? Because they got scared and didn't trust that God would empower them to do even this. The book of Joshua ends with the land not being fully conquered in spite of God's commandment, and therefore the remaining nations serving as a thorn in Israel's side from then on. God's promise not being entirely fulfilled due to the unfaithfulness of Israel rather than because of God being weak is a theme throughout the whole Bible... This is the point behind the blessing and the curse in the Law.

Anything else?
You have got to be kidding.

There's no actual history apart from some names and locations.

There are no known authors.

The mythological stories about talking snakes, magical fruit, talking donkeys, wooden ships holding the entire world's animal population, raising the dead, people who live several centuries old , blowing down walls with horns, keeping the sun still by raising one's arms, furnaces that don't burn people inside a fire, floating swords, throwing down rods that turns into snakes, magical mana from heaven, long magical hair that gives superhuman strength, turning water into wine, feeding a mass crowd with a few fish, magically walking on water..... need I continue?

Not in real life nor real history. That's for sure.
Thats probably why they are called miracles and only something God can do.

If God only had the ability to do what we can then He wouldn’t be a God.

So again, not errors.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Thats probably why they are called miracles and only something God can do.

If God only had the ability to do what we can then He wouldn’t be a God.

So again, not errors.
The error is people thinking these things actually happened in real life.
 
Top