Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How did you go about counting all the possible gods?
I prefer the reality that we can objectively (albeit imperfectly)
I never said we could.
It is what we (imperfectly) observe.
Humans think in concept frames by necessity.
Agreed. the experience is subjective, and, while it may be powerful and seem self-confirming, it remains evidence only for the perceiver.
This is not an answer. This is an excuse many religious people say in debate because they have no actual answer to the question. What you say hre means: anything goes. It means the 9-11 hijackers can claim they had evidence of God and acted according to God's will. Can you say they 9-11 hijackers were wrong? No, because you claim evidence for God is in the heart of the seker, and offer no facts for anyone to distill dogma from truth.
Another claim that offers no evidence. I know what you will say, it's all up to the individual to decide, right?
This is a complaint, not debate. It's just more griping about other using their reasoning skill in eligious debate that theists can't defend against. The only winning strategy for theists is to not engage with critical thinkers. That way Muslims and Christians can exist in their own little bubbles and not face the questing they avoid asking themselves.
There are fornication clubs? I had no idea, never heard of it, that's terrible. You have an address?
IOW, belief is evidence that the belief is true.
That means it's still open to critique. It's not an exemption.
But these aren't the reasons for the biblical admonitions against extramarital sex, and aren't relevant to the priesthood, who don't care if you wanted that baby and don't mind if you feel emotional distress for what they consider sin rightfully punished. Moreover, those don't need to be problems if one proceeds mindfully, which requires sexual education and access to contraception. For the mistakes, we have medical clinics.
I'll take your word on the scripture. And I agree that religions can be alienating. My chief criticism of the Abrahamic faiths is its transference of the concept of the sacred from the universe to a personage living outside of nature who intends to destroy it, who controls the fates of souls after death, and who gives commandments.
I don't know what the New Testament writers meant, but I can give you my opinion. The Abrahamic religions are what can be called self-licking ice cream cones: "a process, department, institution, or other thing that offers few benefits and exists primarily to justify or perpetuate its own existence." They don't exist to benefit mankind or even their adherents. They exist to promote themselves and grow in influence.
Heart and gut are code for intuition, which is not enough for the critical thinker to justify belief.
On the road from polytheism to monotheism, man took a destructive detour as described above. Now, we need to undo that by having this deity evaporate away quality by quality until it is indistinguishable from nature as per your description, and then the concept of a god as a person ruling nature and beyond can be dropped, which concept is not only not needed to consider values or truth, but interferes with a rational approach to each.
It's a philosophical matter based in human psychology. When something becomes evident to the senses (evidence), the mind fleshes it in cognitively then affectively, that is, what does it signify about reality, and how do we feel about it. These latter feelings include several dysphoric feelings like anxiety, regret, grief, etc., but also positive experiences such as finding something beautiful or valuable. The spiritual experience is one of these. An informed experience of the night sky begins with an understanding of what that drop of starlight signifies about its source and the times and distances involved, as well as our connection to it as the source of the heavy elements that comprise our bodies and surroundings. And then comes the affective component - the spiritual experience, a blend of connection, belonging, mystery, awe, and gratitude.
No. Majority of Hindus are drawn to their thousands of Gods and Goddesses.
No. There were hundreds of Adams and Eves, if not thousands.
That might be "hilarious", unless you are a doctor working in Emergency dept. at the weekend.
They will eventually settle on One God.
If you ever find God you will understand but you will be just as incapable of proving it to atheists.