Right, because religious bigots shoot up gay dance clubs to show the world what morality really is.That might be "hilarious", unless you are a doctor working in Emergency dept. at the weekend.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Right, because religious bigots shoot up gay dance clubs to show the world what morality really is.That might be "hilarious", unless you are a doctor working in Emergency dept. at the weekend.
There are fornication clubs? I had no idea, never heard of it, that's terrible. You have an address?
I've worked the emergency dept, on weekends, in a level I trauma center, no less. I don't recall treating any club related fornication emergencies.That might be "hilarious", unless you are a doctor working in Emergency dept. at the weekend.
What evidence is there for a natural reduction of gods over time?They will eventually settle on One God.
ROFL! "Atheist doctrine"...."life invented itself!"The atheist doctrine that life invented itself isn't critical thinking.
How is abiogenesis a delusion? You're misdefining "delusion."The delusion that life invented itself isn't at all convincing.
The wholeidea's just silly. Nobody believes the sky fairy stories anymore. Those things up there are gandharvas.Fortunately, it's not universal.
I don't share belief in sky fairies.
And an unrealistic one.Hopefully .. but you never know what might happen later down the line.
No sex before marriage is a safer option.
The observations that:By their fruits one can distinguish human self-will from Gods will. The 9-11 hijackers concept of God was a reflection of their own image. They were rationalizing, listening to their own hatred.
You don't even believe in Jesus so our complaints are hypocritical.
The atheist doctrine that life invented itself isn't critical thinking.
An option that has been routinely ignored throughout human history.Hopefully .. but you never know what might happen later down the line.
No sex before marriage is a safer option.
How is it now difficult to prove than, say, theft?
Of course they don't !..So someone that has sex when they want doesn't deserve to be assaulted.
All very well in theory, but clearly a problem in practice.Civilized behavior includes letting people be themselves as long as they don't hurt others..
Of course .. human beings sin..An option that has been routinely ignored throughout human history..
Yes, when I lost my faith, I suddenly felt the irresistible need to turn into Hannibal the Cannibal.I'd suppose this depends on what you view as moral behavior but I thought I'd ask the question to see what people would say.
It is easy to justify one's personal morals but I'd like you to consider the world at large. Is the world becoming more moral or less moral?
And, does this have anything to do with the decline of religious belief?
So that's where you can be found when you aren't on RF.
So you only commit adultery and fornicate on occassion. I'm sure God will let you off the hook for not doing it routinely. Thanks for the update on your personal life.Of course .. human beings sin..
However, not all of us commit adultery or fornication routinely.
“The mechanistic philosopher professes to reject the idea of a universal and sovereign will, the very sovereign will whose activity in the elaboration of universe laws he so deeply reverences. What unintended homage the mechanist pays the law-Creator when he conceives such laws to be self-acting and self-explanatory!” UB 1955The observations that:
are, however, quite rational thinking.
- life is essentially chemistry,
- chemistry arises from the laws of physics, and
- physics is the result of quantum mechanics
The claim that primitive life forms kept falling uphill into more complex forms as an unplanned, unaided phenomenon.ROFL! "Atheist doctrine"...."life invented itself!"
How is abiogenesis a delusion? You're misdefining "delusion."
Not convincing? I suspect you don't know the first thing about current hypotheses or research.
“The mechanistic philosopher professes to reject the idea of a universal and sovereign will, the very sovereign will whose activity in the elaboration of universe laws he so deeply reverences. What unintended homage the mechanist pays the law-Creator when he conceives such laws to be self-acting and self-explanatory!” UB 1955
The Urantia Book is not a credible source. I have one myself and read through many parts of it. Wow, different colored aliens from other planets? Aweson idea for a movie script, not science. If you get your science from religious books your beliefs will be wrong and irrelevant. You're on a forum with well-educated people, so you need to refer to reliable and valid sources to make your posts. If you knew science you would have to post anything because you would be well-educated yourself.The claim the primitive life forms kept falling uphill into more complex forms as an unplanned, unaided phenomenon.
“ To science God is a possibility, to psychology a desirability, to philosophy a probability, to religion a certainty, an actuality of religious experience. Reason demands that a philosophy which cannot find the God of probability should be very respectful of that religious faith which can and does find the God of certitude. Neither should science discount religious experience on grounds of credulity, not so long as it persists in the assumption that man’s intellectual and philosophic endowments emerged from increasingly lesser intelligences the further back they go, finally taking origin in primitive life which was utterly devoid of all thinking and feeling.” UB 1955
I will rely on spiritual and philosophical sources of my own choice. Atheists certainly aren’t reliable sources for spiritual truth.The Urantia Book is not a credible source. I have one myself and read through many parts of it. Wow, different colored aliens from other planets? Aweson idea for a movie script, not science. If you get your science from religious books your beliefs will be wrong and irrelevant. You're on a forum with well-educated people, so you need to refer to reliable and valid sources to make your posts. If you knew science you would have to post anything because you would be well-educated yourself.
And that's due cultures of prohibitive regulation, sexual domination and competition. It's the tabu, not the sex, that's causing the problems. Change the culture and rules; eliminate the need for rivalry, and the violence will disappear.All very well in theory, but clearly a problem in practice.
Violence due to sexual rivalry is common.