Even intelligent humans, putting up communication satellites, don’t just throw them up there without some control of its inertia, and expect gravity to just step in!
Planets naturally capture passing objects and make moons of them. No intelligent oversight is required.
we’ve never observed where, after gravity pulled on an object, it established a stable orbit for it!
I'm not sure what you're saying here - that we've never witnessed a planet capture a natural satellite that then orbited it? You're probably correct. Did you think that that was significant? What does it tell you?
"Discredited” is not “disproven” I know you view the existence of a Creator has been discredited. But it hasn’t been disproven.
I don't think that the existence of a creator can be called discredited. It's a combination of lack of sufficient evidence to believe that one exists and the absence of a need for a god to account for anything or to do anything makes the belief unhelpful. But the comment was directed at the myths of Genesis and Exodus, which have been discredited by the sciences.
You only say this because you are atheist, and that causes you to oppose anything remotely truthful about God.
No. I resist belief by faith, and not just belief in gods. And nobody has any knowledge about any god that deserves to be called truth. What you have are fervently held but insufficiently justified beliefs
The atheist simply will not allow himself to consider anything that would threaten his desire to not believe in God.
The critical thinker doesn't (and generally can't) decide what to believe. That's how faith works. Pick an idea you like, believe it, and call it truth. That's what this atheist will not allow himself to do.
This is moral excellence, since it has the family's best interest, and strong families make strong communities. Do you disagree? If so, please explain why.
By families I assume you mean families raising minor children. No, I do not think they make strong communities. Strong communities are the result of a culture of tolerance, a common vision, an adequate economy, and the like. I wish them luck, but such families have little effect on me or my life. My family and household are my wife and me and our dogs, we're very happy, and we don't take our moral advice from holy books or any other source that our consciences.
In any event, you didn't address what I identified as moral failings in the teachings of Jesus, namely that Jesus says marriage to a divorcee is adultery, a man who finds a woman attractive has committed adultery with her, and that one must cut off his hand or pluck out his eye if it offends. Here's the humanist version: Marriage to a divorce is perfectly fine, finding strangers sexually alluring is perfectly fine, and never pluck out eyes or cut off hands unless medically necessary.
Makes me sick.
