I don't think that Bible interpretation is only a matter of personal experience. I stay with my opinion: once you can't prove your point using scripture, it stays speculation, no matter what your experience actually is or was.
Bible never says that it is experience that determines how good an interpretation of scripture really is. Neither does it say that without experience every interpretation of scripture is mere speculation.
So experience being the basis of good Bible exegesis also is your presumption, I think.
I also don't think that someone who has had a good childhood with loving parents or someone who has experienced love from others has a better way of seeing scripture than the one who did not. God does not show favoritism; see Romans 2:11, so he won't favor the ones having had a good childhood.... giving them a better understanding for his Bible.
I stay with my opinion your verses could not show God's puported "unconditional love".
You could not show using scripture that the people in Mark 12:9 did effectively
not know that they killed the son of God. So I presented scripture as to show that there were people around who in fact knew whom they were killing. No speculation. Scripture.
Also, it was
Bible that shows that the moment he said "they know not what they do"... he was indeed at the cross suffering torture. When people suffer torture they're just not in the mood to elaborate an exact stance for 5 minutes, I think. It is allowed to think while reading scripture. I gave a scriptural reason as opposed to speculation.
But here's the thing. The minute you say God is conditional love, you make it about works. It's that simple. If you don't do something right, God does not love you. If you do something right God loves you. That's a salvation of works. You're promoting that by saying God love is conditional. I don't think you can reconcile that with saying salvation is by Grace. [...] So then you "earn" being included. Exactly what you just said. Thomas, you are preaching a salvation of works here. That is what is not Biblical.
no. Who said anything about works. Taking a sandwich that is offered to you, does not mean you "earn" it, as I see it. It's still a gift. You can't credit the one who takes the sandwich for having done a work or even for meriting the sandwich. It was a gift.
The sandwich in my comparison is forgiveness offered by Jesus's atonement... or you could say it's grace. When I say you need to accept it, I'm not refuting the concept of grace, of course.
Even if some people "earn" getting thrown out from the party.... that does not mean that the ones who do not, deserve their sandwich. The sandwich still is a gift, even for those who did not deserve getting thrown out.
So, do you believe if you do something bad, you get thrown out?
Actually, Bible states this:
And he said to him, ‘Friend, how did you get in here without a wedding garment?’ And he was speechless. 13 Then the king said to the attendants, ‘Bind him hand and foot and cast him into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’ 14 For many are called, but few are chosen.”
Mt 22:12-14
Facing ourselves and surrendering to God's love does not necesssarily mean someone is repentant.
---
I maintain that I base my opinions on what I find in the Bible. I do not base an argument solely on "experience".
Even if Bible interpretation changes over time... Christianity cannot change the rules solely on grounds of someone having had an experience or claiming it.
I reject the idea that Christianity should change just because someone claims experience.
No, your verses did not show that God's forgiveness is unconditional. Neither the Prodigal Son nor
"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened. [...]" nor
"Father forgive them, for they know not what they do" as put in its right context.... mirrors unconditional forgiveness, as shown in my previous responses.
These were the only 3 scripture verses you cited to bolster your stance of unconditional forgiveness.
I do not impose anything on God.
No confusion about forgiveness here.
I'm not comparable to one of these folks Jesus speaks to in your cartoon.
Please don't take this debate to the personal level.
I hope that I didn't repeat myself here, except when explicitely introduced a repetition of what I've just said, by using "I maintain" or " I stay with my opinion" or something like that...