Audie
Veteran Member
Ah, that way.
Another Low habit is cutting doors in half.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ah, that way.
Listening to songs of other religions is mostly not for me. I sometimes like secular sufi songs. I can tolerate Hindu devotional music. This is personal. Hinduism has nothing to say about it.Does your religion prevent you from listening to certain types of music?
Or does certain words like curse words etc. prevent you from hearing something?
But you would have no issue listening to pop music, heavy metal, death metal etc.?Listening to songs of other religions is mostly not for me. I sometimes like secular sufi songs. I can tolerate Hindu devotional music. This is personal. Hinduism has nothing to say about it.
I would not like uncivil words. We do not have that in Indian music - religious or classical.
That is not my music. My adventure with Western music ended with Cliff Richard blues. I am an old person.But you would have no issue listening to pop music, heavy metal, death metal etc.?
Another Low habit is cutting doors in half.
Yeah, and we use ovens so small that foreigners would consider them a variety of cooking pots rather than an actual oven.
Ive heard too that the uncles are always scolding people.
Well whaddayaknow, I didn't even know this about my uncles!
I see. To me this prohibition doesn't make sense. Because whether one sing something or simply speak it normally doesn't seem to me to be any different. In fact I would argue that someone speaking normally is far more effective than singing. So if anything that ought to be prohibited.
But again, im an atheist so rarely, if ever, does any of these religious rules make any sense to me and why an all powerful God would care about things like this, it seems rather desperate to me.
I don't agree with Jesus on this, I would not love my enemy and I would be happy to see them fall.
I don't think this is a good teaching at all, that would be like saying that people shouldn't celebrate when WW2 were won and over and to me that is rubbish.
It follows along the same line as "do to others as you want them to do to you" kind of thing, absolutely rubbish teaching. It sound all catchy and right, but really is not something one should live by, in my opinion.
But that still doesn't solve the issue, because lets assume that I thought it was wrong to show Jesus on the cross, that is violence right? So are we going to remove that, or do we keep it because some think it is fine? So you end up with the issue of who decide what is art or acceptable and what is not? otherwise it might just as well stay as it is, because that is what would basically happen, unless someone decided what is allowed and what is not.
But it doesn't apply here.On the other hand people who have displayed such tendencies who have let themselves be molded by God’s word have been transformed into better people. For example a person who wanted revenge because of the injustices he saw in movies toward African Americans during slavery became hate filled and began to act out his hatred on people in the movie theatre, white kids. Then he started to look for other areas he could act out his hatred against his “white oppressors” all because of the injustices he saw play out in the movies. He became a part of a gang, and hate-filled he committed many acts of violence on many people. Then he started to study the Bible with Jehovah’s Witnesses and he let those words, to “return evil to no one,” “to be peaceable to with all people,” and not to avenge yourself mold his life. Later when a rival gang member found him and insulted him and assaulted him he became rage filled and wanted to avenge himself. But he prayed and put into practice what he learned from the Bible. The next day he was alone with this gang member and again became will with range wanted to avenge himself, but again prayed and controlled his temper. It is interesting what that gang member told him
But it doesn't apply here.
The message of Jesus in this case could be good, but people drawing bad or wrong conclusions and acting on them, that is the real problem.
It would be like me saying that "some Muslims are terrorist therefore I hate all of them and they are all bad people so I will do what I can to get rid of them". Which is basically what the guy in the story did.
"For example a person who wanted revenge because of the injustices he saw in movies toward African Americans during slavery became hate filled and began to act out his hatred on people in the movie theatre, white kids."
No one denies, at least not most people, that slavery occurred and was horrible, but drawing the conclusion that therefore all current living white people support slavery and are racists is to draw a wrong conclusion and act on it.
If this person for instance were constantly suffering from racist policemen or white oppression (Enemy), then he should fight it and I don't mean through violence, but whatever way seems reasonable to change how things are they can be improved. He shouldn't run away or love these people for doing something that is clearly wrong.
Things like these shouldn't be accepted or loved, but should be fought.
Does your religion prevent you from listening to certain types of music? ...
Or does certain words like curse words etc. prevent you from hearing something?
But in that case it doesn't matter if you are a believer or not I guess? Im an atheist obviously, but I like peace and love as well, so ill be fine as well, right?.The Bible promises that God will soon forcefully remove all wicked people who do not submit to peace and love.
But in that case it doesn't matter if you are a believer or not I guess? Im an atheist obviously, but I like peace and love as well, so ill be fine as well, right?.
So getting a bit mixed messages here.There will be many unbelievers that will be resurrected back to life in the future paradise on earth. And they will enjoy the rich blessings of Jesus' kingdom rule. But at the same time they will learn the truth and then they will be able to make an informed decision about whether they want to serve God or not.
But I do know about Jesus, God and the bible, but don't see evidence that it is true. So in that case I would be destroyed, because im wicked and don't blindly accept it because someone told me about it? Isn't that sort of like committing eternal murder or what to say?So two groups of people are mentioned here that will be put to death and receive the judicial punishment of everlasting destruction, those who do not know God, an atheist would definitely fit that bill, and those who do not obey the good news. So people who know the truth but don't apply it in their lives.
It is possible because Jehovah has witnesses declaring his name in all the earth and giving people an opportunity to repent that these ones who reject his messengers will be deemed fit for everlasting destruction in God's eyes. Again I will not judge because only God, thru Jesus does the judging at that time. But there are other scriptures that make it apparent that if you don't serve Jehovah God at the end you will be destroyed along with the rest of wicked human society at Armageddon and will not receive a future resurrection.
So getting a bit mixed messages here.
From what you are writing here, from a logical point of view, being an atheist is by far the best choice, because I don't see any difference between you as a JW and me as an atheist when judgement comes. I will simply be able to live my life as I please, without any of the restrictions that comes with a religious belief, yet when the time comes and God reveal himself, I would obviously believe and if God is nothing like that of the bible I might even accept him. But this means that I haven't "sacrificed" anything in my physical life. And God doesn't seem to care anyway from what you are writing here.
But I do know about Jesus, God and the bible, but don't see evidence that it is true. So in that case I would be destroyed, because im wicked and don't blindly accept it because someone told me about it? Isn't that sort of like committing eternal murder or what to say?
In Danish school and assume in many countries, children are thought about the bible, God, Jesus and hear the stories. Any of those that doesn't accept it are potentially going to be destroyed or punished for an ETERNITY without even knowing it. In that case, I would strongly suggest banning all teaching of Christianity and to burn the bible and anyone that mention anything about it to anyone that hasn't agree to it, should be punished for murder. Because again as I wrote above, as an atheist you are far better off, if you can simply make the choice in the very end.
Wouldn't that be just?
And if that is not who these wicked are that you refer to, who exactly are considered wicked then?
I have read the bible and chatted with one of your witnesses for about 2.5 year, very friend person . But I think that is enough to have a reasonable understanding and opinion about it.It really doesn't matter what my standards or views are. You should be more concerned with what Jehovah views as a righteous person and a wicked one. He has set standards that are found in the Bible. You would study it with someone who knows them to learn about them. If you want to please Jehovah then you would live your life in accord to his righteous standards.
Yes, they might very well be. What if the child is handicapped and is unable to communicate? or doesn't it apply here?Let me ask you something, if a good man had children and provided everything they needed and they never recognized him or even thanked him for the good things they had or even for being alive, would you consider these children good children?
Wait, stop.. give me one good reason first, why I should consider what you are saying over what a Bahai, Jew or Muslim might say? And why you are right and they are wrong?There is a reason why Jehovah has raised up witnesses to proclaim the good news about God's kingdom.
I have read the bible and chatted with one of your witnesses for about 2.5 year, very friend person . But I think that is enough to have a reasonable understanding and opinion about it.
What you might not have realized is that im an atheist, which means that I don't care about what the bible, God or Jesus think is right or wrong, unless it can be demonstrated. I don't fear hell, I don't fear eternal punishment and even if God existed I don't think he deserve to be worshipped. So I have no desire or interest in pleasing God in any way, first and foremost, because I don't think there is proof that one even exist to begin with.
Yes, they might very well be. What if the child is handicapped and is unable to communicate? or doesn't it apply here?
Wait, stop.. give me one good reason first, why I should consider what you are saying over what a Bahai, Jew or Muslim might say? And why you are right and they are wrong?
This is the problem that a lot of religious people don't realize when talking to an atheist, everyone speaks to us as if their religion or view of God is right and never have anyone been able to demonstrate or give a good reason for why the others are wrong.
That's "a deeper look" by a nobody as far as it comes to islamic rulings. Islamic rulings come from the Quran and the sunnah.