• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Donald Trump was the greatest president.

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Heh. Yes, the alternative to imperialism is reliance on the scouts. :rolleyes:

There's quite a difference between "imperialism" and "defense". How many countries has the US launched a pre-emptive attack against as being the initial offender over the last century?
 

Regiomontanus

Eastern Orthodox
There's quite a difference between "imperialism" and "defense". How many countries has the US launched a pre-emptive attack against as being the initial offender over the last century?

Wow. No, imperialism today is manifested by our intent to keep our hegemonic control over as much of the world as possible, mainly in corporate/economic domination. That you would support our bloated military is baffling, unless you think we should be the world's police force.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Wow. No, imperialism today is manifested by our intent to keep our hegemonic control over as much of the world as possible, mainly in corporate/economic domination. That you would support our bloated military is baffling, unless you think we should be the world's police force.

Can't help but note you refused to answer the question and just came back with the above hyperbole.

BTW, my father was in the Pacific Theater under Gen. MacArthur during WWII, so was my dad some sort of "imperialist"?
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Putin still wants Trump to be president. You ought to know better than to trust his words. He also denied killing Prigozhin and Navalny. Do you believe that, too?

You agree that "Putin wanted Trump last time." Why do you think you know that? Putin never publicly endorsed Trump. You know it based on events, not words. Putin understands that he's poison to non-Republican Americans and that his endorsement of Trump hurts Trump. This is undoubtedly why he DID come out and support a candidate in 2024, and that that candidate was Biden.

Regarding predictability, both Biden and Trump are very predictable, which is why Putin would have a clear preference for Trump. Biden will predictably continue to denounce Putin, impose sanctions on him, and support Ukraine if the pro-Putin Republicans in Congress can be overcome. Biden will continue to serve as a beacon and exemplary leader of the free world.

And predictably, Trump would do the opposite. He would continue to praise Putin and other dictators, welcome Putin to invade NATO countries and otherwise oppose NATO. Trump would oppose aid to the Ukraine and continue to shame America on the world stage.

Which of these men do you think Putin supports - the one he said he supported but who opposes him, or the one that would be his agent in the White House and provide him with state secrets?

I don't agree that he wanted Trump or now wants Biden. All I can go by is "Putin says"
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
Putin appreciated Trump because he could be controlled. What better way to harm America than from the inside out?
To this day, many Americans are under the spell of Russian propaganda. Many defend Putin, Russia. They would prefer Putin over Biden as potus
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Putin appreciated Trump because he could be controlled. What better way to harm America than from the inside out?
To this day, many Americans are under the spell of Russian propaganda. Many defend Putin, Russia. They would prefer Putin over Biden as potus
Trump and controlled shouldn't be in the same sentence.

You really think Trump is controllable?

I called him a "stick of dynamite" for a reason.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
There's quite a difference between "imperialism" and "defense". How many countries has the US launched a pre-emptive attack against as being the initial offender over the last century?
That's not how imperialism usually works. Even in feudal societies, defensive wars are more popular so something is always *constructed* to make it appear like a defensive war. Such as fake WMDs or alleged but unevidenced torpedo attacks. Or acts of rebellion by enemies we have been systemically oppressing that is now declared reasonable cause for war.

We haven't been in an 'honorable' or 'defensive' war in my entire lifetime. Just been places we shouldn't be to control things we shouldn't be trying to control.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I am an anarchist. I think statism is the most vile thing to grace this planet, and I think statists have Stockholm syndrome in relation to their government. :);):(
I wish people didn’t take government seriously. If we all laughed at the judges funny outfits instead of standing to attention for them, I think this world would be better for it.
American statists take the office of presidency most seriously. The president is their leader. That is why I think Donald Trump is the greatest president. He made a complete mockery of the office. He was a total buffoon! I would turn on the news and be laughing so hard when his petty tweets would be broadcasted. He made a joke of the highest elected position in America. Generally, I saw statists embarrassed by this man. My hope is that he turns people away from statism
I hope he wins in 2024. One, it makes the news a lot more entertaining. Two, I hope he keeps desecrating the sacred office of the presidency in the eyes of statists. #Trump2024 ! #trolling?

New development.....

Judge dismisses some charges against Trump in the Georgia 2020 election interference case​


"ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia 2020 election interference case on Wednesday dismissed some of the charges against former President Donald Trump and others, but the rest of the sweeping racketeering indictment remains intact.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee quashed six counts in the indictment, including three against Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee. But the judge left in place other counts — including 10 facing Trump — and said prosecutors could seek a new indictment to try to reinstate the ones he dismissed."

 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee quashed six counts in the indictment, including three against Trump ... the judge left in place other counts — including 10 facing Trump
An optimist would point out that this means the Judge ruled that 10 charges against Trump had sufficient evidence to go forward.

1710351141089.jpeg


I would say the glass is more than half full
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Trump is a great stick of dynamite. Much better than I ever hoped and dreamed.
If your house needs some repairs, which do you think is the better course of action -- identify the repairs needed, cost them out, and then proceed to make them, or just blow the whole thing up and build another one?

I look at the need for changes in political institutions in the same way.
 

tytlyf

Not Religious

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
If your house needs some repairs, which do you think is the better course of action -- identify the repairs needed, cost them out, and then proceed to make them, or just blow the whole thing up and build another one?

I look at the need for changes in political institutions in the same way.
I agree. What changes would be best?

I'd say term limits for all political offices across the board would be one change I'd be on deck with.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
New development.....

Judge dismisses some charges against Trump in the Georgia 2020 election interference case​


"ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia 2020 election interference case on Wednesday dismissed some of the charges against former President Donald Trump and others, but the rest of the sweeping racketeering indictment remains intact.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee quashed six counts in the indictment, including three against Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee. But the judge left in place other counts — including 10 facing Trump — and said prosecutors could seek a new indictment to try to reinstate the ones he dismissed."


The trouble is that they weren't specific enough with some of the charges, so what could be done would be to resubmit after making the necessary additions. Thus, the judge's decision does not mean nor imply that the charges were bogus.
 
Top