Heyo
Veteran Member
Not a good argument. I know of 76 year olds who are immature and impulsive.But I agree that 17 and 18 year olds are immature and impulsive
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not a good argument. I know of 76 year olds who are immature and impulsive.But I agree that 17 and 18 year olds are immature and impulsive
That's my point, though. It's NOT apples and oranges.Apples and oranges.
The qualities that make a good soldier are not those that make a responsible drinker.
The chances of a drinker being responsible are often inversely proportional to age.
Young people have less driving experience. Their responses are less automatic or reflexive than those of experienced drivers. They get into more accidents. Alcohol diminishes response time and coördination, further slowing response times -- and accident rates.
So their elders are quite happy to use that reckless audacity to send them out and get themselves killed if there's something in it for those elders -- keeping them safe at home.The problem is that the recklessness, audacity and impulsiveness of eighteen year olds, make good fighters, but poor voters -- and drinkers.
The necessary qualities are not comparable.
So this is just pure curiosity on my part.
As I understand it, you can enlist in the military at age 18 in the United States, regardless of the state. Correct?
But there are some (not all) states that stipulate the legal drinking age to be at minimum 21.
I’m under no delusions that people actually wait that long. I mean I’m Australian for crying out loud lol
But how is this seen in the states?
By that I mean is this a rule that is accepted by folks as reasonable? Generally speaking
Or is this a case where people might be inclined to look the other way if an underaged soldier snuck a beer or two?
Since they are, well, in the military.
I want to know your thoughts on this rule and what your observations have been.
Do you think the age should be lowered? Raised? Exceptions made for those serving?
Whatever you reckon, let me know!
The minimum age to join the military should be 71.The minimum age to join the military should be 21.
Agreed. But I wasn’t making an argument against allowing teenagers to drink.Not a good argument. I know of 76 year olds who are immature and impulsive.
InterestingOn June 1st, 1985 all military installations were required to follow state laws in regard to drinking age .
The Navy Dept has required its bases to conform to local drinking age laws since 1973, but it made an exception for 3.2 beer, which has a lower alcohol content.
You think Uni students shouldn't be able to drink? Good luck enforcing that...lolAgreed. But I wasn’t making an argument against allowing teenagers to drink.
I’m Australian. Our legal age is 18. Which I’m pretty sure was lowered due to the argument “old enough to kill. Old enough to drink.”
I was about to say Uni students are already 18. Then I realised I was talking about the States in this thread. Duh! I’m sillyYou think Uni students shouldn't be able to drink? Good luck enforcing that...lol
What age did you start drinking at?
Thus be it ever. The young are duped into fighting to benefit the rich and powerful.So their elders are quite happy to use that reckless audacity to send them out and get themselves killed if there's something in it for those elders -- keeping them safe at home.
Nice.