• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Drug designed to treat COVID-19 could help people heal from virus, researchers claim

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm going with what science says...

"more robust scientific evidence is needed to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines."

See post #59 for the link
Not a straight answer.
Instead it's info which could easily be mistaken
for caution against the dangers of vaccination.
Knowing this, why would you post such a thing?
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
I'm a fan of personal choice subject to the libertarian maxim...
My right to swing my arms ends where my neighbor's nose begins.
That does not sound too kind.
I was reading an article that says scientists have discovered that giving and receiving kindness slows aging.

I won't infect others.
They shouldn't infect me.
Huh? What do you mean? Do you mean approach them with an infected needle, and give them a jab? I don't understand.
Who's trying to infect you.
Wait. You think unvaccinated people are all infected, and will infect you, either intentionally, or unintentionally?

How do you know you won't infect anyone? Do you intend to stay home the rest of your life behind a locked door, where no one comes or goes?
Are you immune to Covid-19 now that you are fully vaccinated?
Are you now immune, and incapable of infecting anyone?

All these questions, give a compulsory "No". So what do you mean, you won't infect anyone? Is that a prophecy?
Surely, you are no prophet from God. ;)

I would not like for you, nor anyone to become infected, but you can't know that you won't be infected (by an unvaccinated, or vaccinated person), true?
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Not a straight answer.
Instead it's info which could easily be mistaken
for caution against the dangers of vaccination.
Knowing this, why would you post such a thing?

Dude you need to take your "from your own mind thoughts" somewhere else.
It clearly states the good the vaccine has done, along with the millions of lives its saved, and also stated more study is needed.

Maybe if you read it instead of jumping to conclusions which you are they master of, you would see the meaning behind the post.
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
Because it's good for them & everyone else.
Seriously? Really? I mean...
May i ask, do you believe in a god? Do you think the vaccine is god? I won't ask if you think you are god, because either way, you might be, but how do you know it's good for them? Was it good for those that died receiving it, do you think?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
That does not sound too kind.
I am direct.
And especially so when I see posts that border on
giving dangerous impressions about medical issues.
As for kindness....I'm at least civil, unlike those who've
accused me of lying or defending slavery (recent stuff).
I was reading an article that says scientists have discovered that giving and receiving kindness slows aging.
I'm a fan of aging.
I plan on continuing it.
Huh? What do you mean? Do you mean approach them with an infected needle, and give them a jab? I don't understand.
Who's trying to infect you.
Wait. You think unvaccinated people are all infected, and will infect you, either intentionally, or unintentionally?
I refer to people who intentionally come into close contact
with others, yet take no precautions to avoid infecting them.
I said nothing about needles...so let's not make such
wild inferences. It's unproductive to address them.
How do you know you won't infect anyone? Do you intend to stay home the rest of your life behind a locked door, where no one comes or goes?
I take reasonable precautions to minimize risk.
Staying home forever is not reasonable.
Are you immune to Covid-19 now that you are fully vaccinated?
Are you now immune, and incapable of infecting anyone?
I don't know.
I still take other precautions.
Do you oppose them?
Surely, you are no prophet from God. ;)
I might be.
Try proving otherwise.
I would not like for you, nor anyone to become infected, but you can't know that you won't be infected (by an unvaccinated, or vaccinated person), true?
Your post strikes me as an argument to avoid taking
precautions. Otherwise why would you present
precautions as staying home for the rest of my life,
despite my having never advocated such extreme
measures?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It was simply pointing out that you post your own thoughts without reading the study.
You don't know what I've read or not.
I'm addressing your posts, which give me the
impression of discouraging vaccination by
presenting partial information toward that end.
You could try giving direct answers.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I am direct.
And especially so when I see posts that border on
giving dangerous impressions about medical issues.
As for kindness....I'm at least civil, unlike those who've
accused me of lying or defending slavery (recent stuff).

I'm a fan of aging.
I plan on continuing it.

I refer to people who intentionally come into close contact
with others, yet take no precautions to avoid infecting them.
I said nothing about needles...so let's not make such
wild inferences. It's unproductive to address them.

I take reasonable precautions to minimize risk.
Staying home forever is not reasonable.

I don't know.
I still take other precautions.
Do you oppose them?

I might be.
Try proving otherwise.

Your post strikes me as an argument to avoid taking
precautions. Otherwise why would you present
precautions as staying home for the rest of my life,
despite my having never advocated such extreme
measures?

"Are you immune to Covid-19 now that you are fully vaccinated?
Are you now immune, and incapable of infecting anyone?"


"I don't know.
I still take other precautions.
Do you oppose them?"

What does science says about what you don't know?
 

We Never Know

No Slack
You don't know what I've read or not.
I'm addressing your posts, which give me the
impression of discouraging vaccination by
presenting partial information toward that end.
You could try giving direct answers.

With an abstract and study that takes several minutes to read(probably more than five), unless your are the fastest reader alive, then I have a good idea when you replied within one minute.

What does science says? More study is needed or we need no more studies?
Direct answers please.

An Updated Review of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and the Importance of Effective Vaccination Programs in Pandemic Times
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Dude you need to take your...
Lucky for you, I'm not going anywhere.
The "good done" by Ivermectin is not for Covid.
Maybe if you read it instead of jumping to conclusions which you are they master of, you would see the meaning behind the post.
Maybe your posts might show greater care to avoid
potentially discouraging people from vaccination.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It was simply pointing out that you post your own thoughts without reading the study.
Your study doesn't justify using Ivermectin for Covid treatment.
There is a risk that such posts might inspire people to use it
for that. What I've read or not read is irrelevant to the danger
created by people taking horse de-worming medicine.
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
I am direct.
And especially so when I see posts that border on
giving dangerous impressions about medical issues.
As for kindness....I'm at least civil, unlike those who've
accused me of lying or defending slavery (recent stuff).

I'm a fan of aging.
I plan on continuing it.

I refer to people who intentionally come into close contact
with others, yet take no precautions to avoid infecting them.
I said nothing about needles...so let's not make such
wild inferences. It's unproductive to address them.

I take reasonable precautions to minimize risk.
Staying home forever is not reasonable.

I don't know.
I still take other precautions.
Do you oppose them?

I might be.
Try proving otherwise.

Your post strikes me as an argument to avoid taking
precautions. Otherwise why would you present
precautions as staying home for the rest of my life,
despite my having never advocated such extreme
measures?
Summary:
You don't know you won't infect anyone?
You don't know that a vaccinated person won't infect you.
You don't know that an unvaccinated person will get infected, or infect you.
You take reasonable precautions to minimize risks. Others do as well.
I'll say no more, lest I violate the new "policy".

However, I take note of the strawman in the last comment, rather than responding to the question(s). ;)
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Your study doesn't justify using Ivermectin for Covid treatment.
There is a risk that such posts might inspire people to use it
for that. What I've read or not read is irrelevant to the danger
created by people taking horse de-worming medicine.
Wow! You are one the wrong thread. Thanks for showing how much attention you are paying.

Are you trying to derail this thread?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Summary:
You don't know you won't infect anyone?
You don't know that a vaccinated person won't infect you.
You don't know that an unvaccinated person will get infected, or infect you.
You take reasonable precautions to minimize risks. Others do as well.
I'll say no more, lest I violate the new "policy".

However, I take note of the strawman in the last comment, rather than responding to the question(s). ;)
Are you now complaining about your own starwman?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Wow! You are one the wrong thread. Thanks for showing how much attention you are paying.
I'm covering more than one thread wherein your posts
have been (IMO) discouraging vaccination by omission
& by ridiculing those who got the shots, eg, claiming
it's out of fear, that we got the shots only to "save my
own ****".
Given the danger posed by Covid, it is our responsibility
to not post misinformation that would lead people to
do unsafe things (IMO).
 
Top