Midnight Pete
Well-Known Member
What crime are you specifically talking about?
Hmmm. Does the name Pablo Escobar mean anything to you?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What crime are you specifically talking about?
And what about all the crime and death and suffering that results from people using illegal narcotics? How can you possibly justify that?
The assumption that taking or using a drug is progressive. First it's pot, then meth, then coke, then heroin.......
Hmmm. Does the name Pablo Escobar mean anything to you?
Hmmm. Does the name Pablo Escobar mean anything to you?
And what about all the crime and death and suffering that results from people using illegal narcotics? How can you possibly justify that?
Tell that to Cory Maye. Much of the violence surrounding illicit drugs is due to the black market. If you take away the black market and regulate the use of popular drugs, such as marijuana, ecstasy, and LSD, than you would probably see less crime. Remove the stigma regarding these drugs and you would probably see a willingness of people to seek help for these drugs.
Caffeine and nicotine are drugs. If the progressive theory is true than consuming nicotine or caffeine are indicative of hard drug use. Of course, we know they are not but if the theory holds than they must be. Go figure. To date, marijuana has never been determined as a cause of death but alcohol has. Numerous times. I can describe the experiences in rehab of people brought in for alcohol addiction and their chances of survival compared to heroin addicts. Hint: Alcoholics face a far more serious chance of survival than heroin addicts. Heroin's death rate can be attributed as much to dirty needles and bad drugs as opposed to the actual chemical addiction between alcohol and heroin.
He was a crime lord. Take away the source of the profits of these crime lords than they will not be or they will redirect their efforts to other black market enterprises such as gambling.
Why do you think black markets exist in the first place? Why does criminal activity exist in the first place? No, it doesn't matter what you legalize because there will always be activities outside the law so long as the law exists.
And what about all the crime and death and suffering that results from people using illegal narcotics? How can you possibly justify that?
I'm of the opinion that victimless crimes, such as cannabis use or prostitution where all involved are consenting adults and no innocent people are victimized or their rights violated, should be legalized, taxed and regulated. It's called freedom. The silly thing is that there are far more risky and dangerous things than those that are completely legal. It should be left to personal responsibility, not a babysitting government.
And people die while irresponsibly rock climbing as well. Should we make rock climbing illegal? At what point do we say, if people want to do something that doesn't directly negatively affect somebody else, then for no other reason than freedom's sake, let them do it?
Look at the state your country is in.
Personal responsibility isn't worth **** if no one ever takes responsibility for anything.
It is not what goes into a man that defiles him but what comes out. We must condemn in order to justify our unwillingness to forgive. The poor we have with us always.And what about all the crime and death and suffering that results from people using illegal narcotics? How can you possibly justify that?
You are constitutionally empowered to drink paint, but does that make drinking paint a good idea?
What state would that be exactly, and do you think it necessitates trampling rights and liberty?Look at the state your country is in.
Personal responsibility isn't worth **** if no one ever takes responsibility for anything.
And people die while irresponsibly rock climbing as well. Should we make rock climbing illegal? At what point do we say, if people want to do something that doesn't directly negatively affect somebody else, then for no other reason than freedom's sake, let them do it?
I completely agree with you. I am one that doesn't have the urge to use drugs since I'm naturally hyper anyway. I don't even drink alcohol but maybe once a year.And like I just said, I don't find that this is the case, or at least not most of the time with almost everyone I have ever known. There are plenty of responsible drug users that understand, based on the pros and cons, with addiction, physical danger, and enjoyment, what drugs should be stayed away from.
Ding,ding we have a winner.I think it's adorable how cannabis is demonized, despite being significantly less dangerous, unhealthy, harmful and addictive than alcohol, which is heavily marketed. Hell, fast food has killed far more people than pot ever has.
Are you referring to crime? If you are, then you should know that many of our inmates are in for victimless crimes and/or drug crimes. Many of the murderous felons are for murdering other drug dealers or competitors (other gang members). Selling illegal drugs in the US is a lucrative business. If it was legalized and taxed, we would save a ton of money. People that use drugs will still use drugs and those that don't still won't.Look at the state your country is in.
Personal responsibility isn't worth **** if no one ever takes responsibility for anything.
You are constitutionally empowered to drink paint, but does that make drinking paint a good idea?