Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't think there is any proof that the boy in the story was actually Einstein (or that it is even based on a true event). I'd welcome being proven wrong, however.
I'm not sure that this really solves the problem of evil. I think it best represents an attempt to define evil more than anything.You're missing the point.
Einstein didn't believe in a deity that taught morality, and one of his hypotheses is that he thought it possible that God was the energy of creation.
I didn't watch it as I'm a bit too strapped for time.You're also missing the point of the video.
I didn't watch it as I'm a bit too strapped for time.
I didn't know there was a rule against it, plus I would think that maybe you should know something about Einstein before posting.Then you shouldn't be making drive-by comments.
I think it's the idea that is important, not who actually said it.I don't think there is any proof that the boy in the story was actually Einstein (or that it is even based on a true event). I'd welcome being proven wrong, however.
I think it's the idea that is important, not who actually said it.
And I agree with it. Even before I ever heard this idea several years ago, I had the same idea about it. A lot of us have.St. Augustine is the one who first proposed it.
I didn't know there was a rule against it, plus I would think that maybe you should know something about Einstein before posting.
You're missing the point.
I think it is a garbage argument, regardless of who said it (or didn't say it). Evil is not the absence of good.Einstein solves the problem of evil. He does this by explaining that evil is the privation of good. This is the standard Christian explanation. (The YouTube video is only 2 minutes long.)
Had more time that I thought,
plus I realized that the video was only couple minutes long, so I did watch it.
Even though it does quote Einstein properly at the end, there are two problems with the video:
1. Einstein would not have used the terminology "God's love" for the reason I previously gave, and...
2.the arguments of the boy in terms of cold and light simply are not really valid points in the context of the issue of "evil". Einstein did not believe in "evil" in the theological sense of the word, but he did believe in "evil" in regards to man's inhumanity to man.
Do you honestly believe your sarcasm somehow makes you look like a real adult? Maybe we can discuss something when you decide to act less childish.Imagine that!
Well, you would have realized that if you had bothered to read the OP (which was only two sentences).
This is not about Einstein! (That's just a gimmick to make a point. Gawd!)
Do you honestly believe your sarcasm somehow makes you look like a real adult? Maybe we can discuss something when you decide to act less childish.
I think it is a garbage argument, regardless of who said it (or didn't say it). Evil is not the absence of good.