Electromagnetic Formation.

[Native]

Subject: Electromagnetic Planetary Formation.

In this video, Anton Petrov discuss the Solar System formation of planets and their specific metallicities.

Relevant connected article: “Terrestrial planet compositions controlled by accretion disk magnetic field” -
Terrestrial planet compositions controlled by accretion disk magnetic field | Progress in Earth and Planetary Science | Full Text

Article excerpt:
“Here we predict terrestrial planet compositions and show that their core mass fractions, and uncompressed densities correlate with their heliocentric distance, and follow a simple model of the magnetic field strength in the protoplanetary disk”.

(In comparison, read the consensus hypothesis of formation here - Protoplanetary disk - Wikipedia – where the unexplained “gravity” is thought to play the main role).

- Of course, as I´ve supported the E&M for a long time, I´m very pleased to hear and read of a very logical and natural hypothesis in where the more powerful fundamental forces of E&M plays the overall role in the Universe.

It is very logical that planets which contains more “iron core structures” are formed closest to the electromagnetic force and field of the Sun.

Besides this, the amount of atmospheres in planets also plays a role of having and EM circuit – or not - when being ionized by the electromagnetic rays from the Sun.

On the galactic scale, the EM force working in plasmatic states, of course also plays the main role of starry formation and motion in galaxies. The EM formation and circuital field motion is the only and logical way of explaining the galactic rotation curve, hence no “dark matter” is needed at all.

Your thoughts on this?

Regards
Native
Natural Philosopher.

 

[Meow Mix]

I mean, the paper you cite itself acknowledges the role of gravitational collapse as the mechanism of formation. I don't think this paper says what you think it says.

 

[Native]

I mean, the paper you cite itself acknowledges the role of gravitational collapse as the mechanism of formation.

1) Anton Petrov speaks specifically of strong magnetic field in/on/around the Sun as a formative force in the creation of our Solar System.
2) It´s correct that the article don´t reject the "gravitational collapse model" - even as it´s title states "Terrestrial planet compositions controlled by accretion disk magnetic field".

Both Anton Petrov and the article authors don´t make the logical electromagnetic formation connection - but I certainly do.

If the "accreted" composition in planets are controlled by electromagnetic fields, it logically is the mentioned EM force in the video which formes the planets.

As everything else in the Universe.