Ostronomos
Well-Known Member
I'm almost entirely lucid and content through the mastery of peace of mind.
Congratulations.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm almost entirely lucid and content through the mastery of peace of mind.
There is empirical evidence in that the universe exists, and it is suitable for life. The chances of all the constants being just right is very small. Atheists get around that by saying there are probably many universes, but I see many universes as an evidence for God.
Atheists don't have to 'get around' the fact that the chances of the universe turning out the way it has is very small. The chances that any one individual will win the lottery is very small, yet it happens all of the time. It certainly isn't 'evidence for God'. And the fact that it may be statistically improbable that the universe would exists as it does is not evidence for God. It's simply evidence that something statistically improbable occurred.
When God appears, It is because He is specifically addressing a single observer. Any attempt to unveil His existence to another would cause Him to vanish without a trace. Because God is intelligent beyond question. Hence He cannot be proven by consensus. However, I have proven His existence on this forum. Even introducing what I call the God equation.
But probability is the very bane of your argument as the very chance or probability that God exists is minute, and that is enough to guarantee His existence.
That doesnt tell me about his existence and nature of it. It only means you experienced X and I have no point of reference to judge the validity of your experiences and origin of them.
What is a god?
LOL RIGHT! Because the chances that I'll win the lottery is minute, THAT means it's enough to GUARANTEE that I'll be the one who wins it!
Gotta LOVE your pretend logic. Though it does fit perfectly with the logic of your OP. My brain imagined something while I was in a state of altered consciousness, therefor it MUST be real!
But you cannot equate winning the lottery to a self-creative God. the mosIft minute chance that a God can exist is even minutely possible, then this guarantees the inevitability of His existence due to self-creative capacity. The omnipotence allows Him to pop into existence when the mere need arises.
Aside from the perplexing fact that reality is often not what it seems to be.Because reality has clear and obvious distinctions from any and everything else. It is unmistakable.
Okay, based on what you just wrote, tell me if what I'm about to write is just as valid.
If the most minute chance that magical unicorns can exist is even minutely possible, then this guarantees the inevitability of magical unicorns existence due to self-creative capacity.
A God is a One. A supreme reality or non-separation or unity by spirit.
That doesnt tell me about his existence and nature of it. It only means you experienced X and I have no point of reference to judge the validity of your experiences and origin of them.
Are unicorns self-creative? Can they generate their own existence from nothing the way God and virtual particles are able to?
I am a valid observer of existence.
The omnipotence allows Him to pop into existence when the mere need arises.
That doesnt make sense. Reality isnt supreme. If it were, it wouldnt be a reality. Sounds more like science fiction. Realms. Ultimate.
Try not to make it complicated. Take the universe, as already mentioned.
What exactly did you find to match the universe with god?
If reality, it cannot:
1. Be subjective. Believers cannot just say "well, atheist believe in false doctine etc or cohabit with peers that everyone else is blind". Confirmation bias is not evidence
2. Be an essences, supreme,spirit,force,etc
These are abstract words. They are experienced and cannot be explained by fancy sci-fi terms. It does not need to be objective to exist.
However, when you try to that leaves you with the role of supporting your statement with something concrete not just agreed upon you and your peers.
3. It cannot rely on sycronized and pattern evidence. Most of us experienced both of these. A lot of us dont attribute it to god.
Explain how these experiences are from god that are alien (but not sci-fi) from those who dont believe in god.
What exactly would pop into existence?
Are unicorns self-creative? Can they generate their own existence from nothing the way God and virtual particles are able to?
Nope, you misunderstood the argument. By "odds" there are countless possibilities. It could be your God, equally so it could have been Universe Farting Pixies that began our universe. Or most likely in my book natural causes that are not fully understood right now.But probability is the very bane of your argument as the very chance or probability that God exists is minute, and that is enough to guarantee His existence.
Just as much as your God is,yes.Are unicorns self-creative? Can they generate their own existence from nothing the way God and virtual particles are able to?