Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
Spiritual metal!!?? That's a new one
Your prophet said you can literally see it as mentioned in the hadeeth I posted in previous post.
It helps to note sarcasm when it appears.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Spiritual metal!!?? That's a new one
Your prophet said you can literally see it as mentioned in the hadeeth I posted in previous post.
Shh, you might damage the idea that only non-believers are rational. :sad:Congrats?
I'm hoping you realize that everything you just said applies equally to "non-believers" as well. Personally, I'd drop the nasty attitude and claims that some broad classification of people are "delusional" and recognize that all humans are guilty of confirmation bias.
But opponents do not care about it. They will always say it is meant literally, even if evidence is given.There's people/scholars who don't take the verses about Gog & Magog literaly (i think it's a minority)
It helps to note sarcasm when it appears.
No because this story has many problems with it as mentioned in my thread, regardless of whether it's a big fish or whale. Including the fact it claims a man could have remained inside a fish till judgement day.
I'm agnostic and have a rational view of things. I accept there may be a God we have no understanding of, just like we don't know everything about the cosmos.
The evidence for evolution is overwhelming, therefore it's a logical explanation.
No.
This is absurd reasoning, but we are discussing the Koran not whether God exists or not. The prophet was considered a mad man for other reasons.
Not because of the absurd stories in the Koran, many of which would've been quite popular during his time as these stories were common in primitive cultures/religions.
In fact, the Koran describes the world just as you would expect a 7th century desert dweller to do so. It contains many popular myths of that time.
Such as solid sky canopy, geocentric universe, seven visible heavens and so on. Though, fear may prevent you from seeing this.
Not silly at all.
Believing a huge unscalable iron wall exists when it doesn't is silly.
Believing an ant can recognize a human and his army is silly.
Believing a rock has intelligence, emotion and can talk is silly.
Believeing a man can remain within a fish/whale till judgement is silly.
But then fear can make one believe in anything.
Fear can paralyse the logical part of the brain. Therefore nothing can be too silly.
Not even a man flying to heaven on his winged horse!
Believing an ant can recognize a human and his army is silly.
There's people/scholars who don't take the verses about Gog & Magog literaly (i think it's a minority)
Others who believe what you said thinking we can see the wall and it's in the Caucasus.
Others (like me) believe we can't see it/them.
Everyone have a different opinion when it's concern the interpretation of the Quran and hadiths.
I personally believe this hadiths contradict the Quran so i don't believe it.
Also we don't know if those hadiths are classified as weak or no. (but doesn't make a difference as the Quran says otherwise)
I removed the link video because i didn't watch it till the end and it was just more suppositions i disagree with but search for "Gog & Magog barrier Caucasus" and you'll have a certain point of view about those who believe in the existence of a visible barrier/wall.
It helps to note sarcasm when it appears.
But opponents do not care about it. They will always say it is meant literally, even if evidence is given.
Gog and Magog will never be known except in the end of times.
[youtube]Doa42mMvqy4[/youtube]
EOTW Gog and Magog Ep2
And what about if it was in some exegesis?The evidence..lol!
Not the Koran.
Not the hadith.
Not the classical scholars.
Only wishful thinking.
Not so much sarcasm as my effort to help him understand that words can be interpreted all sorts of ways. He's not the final arbiter of a verse's meaning.
Scripture isn't guilty. People who interpret it nastily are guilty.
Congrats?
I'm hoping you realize that everything you just said applies equally to "non-believers" as well. Personally, I'd drop the nasty attitude and claims that some broad classification of people are "delusional" and recognize that all humans are guilty of confirmation bias.
Why don't you go through each verse by one and tell how I'm wrong.
And also explain why the hadith and classical scholars agree.
Does any Muslim actually read the scripture
And what about if it was in some exegesis?
Would you count it then?
I'd like to think so, but I'm not so hopeful.
Truthfully? Well... because I don't take you[r position] seriously enough.
Sorry. You strike me as a typical religion basher, just starting off on his bashing campaign and not ready for a serious look at it.
I dunno. Because classical scholars tend to be word-worshippers, like you?
Beats me. Maybe you should ask them.
:areyoucra
See what I mean?
If you ever get over your bashing stage and want to talk, let me know.
Whenever your're able to defend scripture, let me know.
Defend scripture. Goodness. It's what I was saying earlier. You believe in words. I don't think you've yet considered anything past that.
Just my impression.