• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evidences Supporting the Biblical Flood

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Irrelevant as no humans existed in parallel with the dinosaurs. If they are not flesh and blood they are not humans. Words have meaning you know. Perhaps buy a dictionary.

Man was there with the dinosaurs.

As I did not say they were human beings.

I said man was there with the dinosaurs.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
There was a real King of Sumer named Ziusudra who lived in 2900 BC. Spring rains and snowmelt from the mountains caused a flood that swept his barges south .. where he eventually ended up in the Persian Gulf. He hauled grain, beer and livestock down river.

This must have happened periodically in the Euphrates River Basin to explain the formation of the delta South of Basra.

Most think the Babylonian flood story is based on this.
I did a Google search on that tablet and at least according to this Wikipedia article that flood that you referred to is the same one that I linked:

Sumerian King List - Wikipedia
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
No evidence of that.


What do you think man means?



Again dictionary... get one.


Well seeing that Prophet Daniel referred to the angel Gabriel as a man.
So that means that the angels as being man. These angels are the Celestial man

The book of Daniel 9:21---"Yea, whiles I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation"

Take notice that Daniel called the angel Gabriel a man.
Note to fly swiftly
 

sooda

Veteran Member
I did a Google search on that tablet and at least according to this Wikipedia article that flood that you referred to is the same one that I linked:

Sumerian King List - Wikipedia

Good work...

The list blends prehistorical, presumably mythical predynastic rulers enjoying implausibly lengthy reigns with later, more plausibly historical dynasties. Although the primal kings are historically unattested, that does not preclude their possible correspondence with historical rulers who were later mythicized. Some Assyriologists view the predynastic kings as a later fictional.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Well seeing that Prophet Daniel referred to the angel Gabriel as a man.
So that means that the angels as being man. These angels are the Celestial man

The book of Daniel 9:21---"Yea, whiles I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation"

Take notice that Daniel called the angel Gabriel a man.
Note to fly swiftly

So angels were cavorting with dinosaurs?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Seeing your having problems in reading.

I didn't say anything about men.

I said man was there with the dinosaurs
No, no no. It was pink and purple polka dotted Martians. Or was it purple and pink polka dotted Martians? . . . That does not really matter. What matters is that we all agree that it was Martians.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Well seeing that Prophet Daniel referred to the angel Gabriel as a man.

So that means that the angels as being man. These angels are the Celestial man

The book of Daniel 9:21---"Yea, whiles I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation"

Take notice that Daniel called the angel Gabriel a man.
Note to fly swiftly


No he didn't as Daniel does not speak English. Beside D claiming X does not make it true nor a definition of anything

You are shifting the context here to fit your narrative. The Bible says nothing about dinosaurs but here you are using the word. Again cherry picking.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
No he didn't as Daniel does not speak English. Beside D claiming X does not make it true nor a definition of anything

You are shifting the context here to fit your narrative. The Bible says nothing about dinosaurs but here you are using the word. Again cherry picking.

We're going to leap from here to the patriarch's living 600 years. I think I'll go soak my head.
 
Top