Lets see if we can clear some confusion. Answer the poll based on the two following statements.
"Evolution is what happened after life formed no matter if it was formed by abiogenesis, a god, an alien, etc.. Evolution happened after life formed.
The BB is what happened after the universe began no matter if the beginning was by a god, an alien, a fairy, etc.. The BB happened after the beginning.
Regarding evolution, I would challenge the attempt to describe the formation of life as if it were a discrete event rather than a process. Furthermore one has to be a bit careful what one means by evolution. Classical Darwinian evolution requires an organism that replicates and passes on instructions for further replication to the products of replication. So I would agree that classical Darwinian evolution requires life to be already present. But I am not willing to agree that life appeared in an event, nor that Darwinian evolution is the only mechanism that may have operated to enable replicating biochemical systems to sustain themselves and develop in complexity.
Regarding the Big Bang, you and I have discussed this elsewhere but, for the benefit of other readers, The Big Bang is the current model for the evolution of the cosmos and it
suggests that there was a start point, at a singularity. Some people use the term Big Bang to include this presumed singularity, but as the observational evidence can't allow that to be predicted with confidence, doing so is a bit speculative.
As a general observation, you seem to think you can browbeat science, by force of rhetoric, into simple categories of firm knowledge vs. total ignorance. This, I think, is naive.
I have not responded to your poll.
