Evolution has a basic premise that is "progressive". It is not necessarily progressive in adaptation, or competition, or complexity, but it is progressive in one of these senses. Each of these have serious flaws but the principle flaw is the sense of progress. This simply is not evident in Nature, it also betray's man's mind in constructing evolutionary theory. Because a man may believe in progress, and specifically goes to war for that belief. So let's observe nature and look for conflict.
Nature at War, is a catchy phrase. We find in the imaginary world, nature is always at war. In fantasy we construct elves, spirits, treeants, evil and good manifested in characture.
In science fiction we find nature incredibly hostile to man, Avatar comes to mind. Mankind in his present mind is at war with nature, and nature can fight back. Although more biologically less spiritually.
Even in scientific worlds we describe the natural world as warlike. Dinosaurs fought, Ice Afe creatures were built for this fantasy war.
But in the end it was only fantasy.
The real world is not a nature at war, but in perfect harmony. And here evolutionary theory falls apart.
Adaptation necessarily requires some competition, but as we see with man's invention competition leads to Genocide, Nuclear weapons, and total war.
A world at war in nature would be incredibly hostile. Fighting to be the fittest, dogs would run wild in packs and eat men and kill animals other than themselves at all times.
Any Predator would kill for the sake of killing, preventing another predator from advancing.
Prey would be better guarded. Gazelle would be armored, elephants would raid the camps of lions and smash them to death. Herds would rampage the plain trampling all under foot.
Trees would ooze poison.
Every plant would have thorns.
Disease would spread uncontrollably.
There is absolutely no reason for the emmense cooperation we see in the natural world were evolution true.
The natural world is incredibly cooperative and we see this expressed in the food web, the web is fragile, yet every creature plays it's part for the WHOLE.
Every creature, except man.
Mankind runs around and plays it's part for its self.
These illogical operations can suggest only one thing. And it is the correct observation by thousands of generations.
Mankind is not of nature; is not a creature like any other in the natural world. Mankin alone progresses. And even that is an illusory progress.
But mankind can choose to take everything for himself. Where as every other creature must work as a part of a complete machine.
And most of all, nature does not tho it should, wipe out humanity in a torrent of angry animals, plants, and microbes.
Nature at War, is a catchy phrase. We find in the imaginary world, nature is always at war. In fantasy we construct elves, spirits, treeants, evil and good manifested in characture.
In science fiction we find nature incredibly hostile to man, Avatar comes to mind. Mankind in his present mind is at war with nature, and nature can fight back. Although more biologically less spiritually.
Even in scientific worlds we describe the natural world as warlike. Dinosaurs fought, Ice Afe creatures were built for this fantasy war.
But in the end it was only fantasy.
The real world is not a nature at war, but in perfect harmony. And here evolutionary theory falls apart.
Adaptation necessarily requires some competition, but as we see with man's invention competition leads to Genocide, Nuclear weapons, and total war.
A world at war in nature would be incredibly hostile. Fighting to be the fittest, dogs would run wild in packs and eat men and kill animals other than themselves at all times.
Any Predator would kill for the sake of killing, preventing another predator from advancing.
Prey would be better guarded. Gazelle would be armored, elephants would raid the camps of lions and smash them to death. Herds would rampage the plain trampling all under foot.
Trees would ooze poison.
Every plant would have thorns.
Disease would spread uncontrollably.
There is absolutely no reason for the emmense cooperation we see in the natural world were evolution true.
The natural world is incredibly cooperative and we see this expressed in the food web, the web is fragile, yet every creature plays it's part for the WHOLE.
Every creature, except man.
Mankind runs around and plays it's part for its self.
These illogical operations can suggest only one thing. And it is the correct observation by thousands of generations.
Mankind is not of nature; is not a creature like any other in the natural world. Mankin alone progresses. And even that is an illusory progress.
But mankind can choose to take everything for himself. Where as every other creature must work as a part of a complete machine.
And most of all, nature does not tho it should, wipe out humanity in a torrent of angry animals, plants, and microbes.
