So it is not the religion as such. It is the religion and something more.
Good point. Islam is in fact a totalitarian ideology that happens to have a religious facet.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So it is not the religion as such. It is the religion and something more.
That you describe is not unique to Islam.
...
I believe that there are a core set of ideas in Islam. Anyone who declares themselves a Muslim is declaring that they support the core ideas of Islam. They have CHOSEN to be a member of this group, and while they are all different, they do have this one important thing in common.
Further, I see attempt after attempt by apologists to claim that Islam can't be pinned down to a single set of ideas. Well you cannot have it both ways. If Islam doesn't stand for anything, why are we asked to respect it?
Good point. Islam is in fact a totalitarian ideology that happens to have a religious facet.
No, it is not just that.
Well this could lead us to an interesting set of semantics
No, you could read a sufficiently broad scholarly work on Islam and learn what I have learned. I mean I came across one Muslim who was humanistic, secular and pacifist.
Islam is as open to interpretation as any other religion.
Here is an historic example:
Nonviolence from the unlikeliest of places - Waging Nonviolence
There are many denominations of Christianity. Each emphasizes their interpretation of the basics. Among other things, the fact that Christians have made these denominations is a friendly gesture for the rest of the world.
I have no doubt that there are secular-humanist Muslims. But there are probably very few of them in the world of 1.8 billion Muslims. So for those of us who want to have friendly interactions with people of all belief systems, it would be a courtesy for Muslims to declare the denomination of Islam they follow.
I'm sure you'd fit right in with the hadith rejecters. They hate the truth and will not acknowledge it if it's right in front of them.it would be a courtesy for Muslims to declare the denomination of Islam they follow.
A Muslim by definition cannot support secularism for Muslim countries.I came across one Muslim who was humanistic, secular and pacifist.
Sounds like you're implying that that more is something unknowable, but it isn't.if you look closer there is not single set of ideas, because Islam is more than just the Qur'an.
A Muslim by definition cannot support secularism for Muslim countries.
I'm sure you'd fit right in with the hadith rejecters. They hate the truth and will not acknowledge it if it's right in front of them.
Sounds like you're implying that that more is something unknowable, but it isn't.
I'm not understanding you, can you rephrase that? thx!
You can google it. Start with hadith. Then look for hadith rejecters or rejectors. It is not that hard to understand.
It isn't about what makes a country Muslim, but about what Islam teaches. Based on the Qur'an and the Hadith it is not possible for a learned Muslim to support secularism in a Muslim country. The reason I say in a Muslim country is that it would be absurd for someone in Canada or UK to support some other form of government, the Islamic law is for Muslims. But if there is a Muslim living in the US and he or she says KSA should be secular, he either doesn't have faith in the Islamic law or he is ignorant about it.Well, yes and no. But then we enter the fallacy of No True Scotsman and what makes a country Muslim.
I get what you are saying. For a certain understanding of Islam it is not possible, yet the Ottoman Empire in a certain sense did so. Now I am not that familiar with the Mughal Empire but maybe they did the same in some sense.
And I do believe than some modern Muslim countries are moving in that direction.
It isn't about what makes a country Muslim, but about what Islam teaches. Based on the Qur'an and the Hadith it is not possible for a learned Muslim to support secularism in a Muslim country. The reason I say in a Muslim country is that it would be absurd for someone in Canada or UK to support some other form of government, the Islamic law is for Muslims. But if there is a Muslim living in the US and he or she says KSA should be secular, he either doesn't have faith in the Islamic law or he is ignorant about it.
It worked fine for Turkey for most of the c.20th.A Muslim by definition cannot support secularism for Muslim countries.