• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Facebook Ignored 455 Complaints About Militia Page Urging Weapons at Kenosha Protest

ecco

Veteran Member
One shouldn't presume that a comments addressing
one side means denying other sides. If important to
you, then just ask. Better to know than guess wrongly.
When a person almost always posts on the same side of the fence, no one needs to ask his meaning or motives.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
When a person almost always posts on the same side of the fence, no one needs to ask his meaning or motives.
Well then...by your standard one should infer that you
approve of left wing violence against innocent people.

See...the kind of prejudice you advocate can work
against you. Tis better to address the post, rather
than make it about your tribalism.
 
Last edited:

ecco

Veteran Member
Well then...by your standard one should infer that you
approve of left wing violence against innocent people.
Would you care to substantiate that baseless (BS) allegation with a quote of mine endorsing violence against innocent people.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Would you care to substantiate that baseless (BS) allegation with a quote of mine endorsing violence against innocent people.
Of course it's baseless.
That's the point.
I'm using your standard & applying reductio ad absurdum.
The bogus conclusion disproves the standard.
 
Top