• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Fact-free teaching on sex

Pah

Uber all member
Fact-free teaching on sex

Complete article

By ROBYN E. BLUMNER, Times Perspective Columnist
Published December 12, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1938 government antimarijuana propaganda film Reefer Madness is still watched today for its campy excesses. Dr. Carroll, the moralizing high school principal, warns parents that marijuana is more dangerous than opium and heroin. Those who smoke the drug are depicted as instantly addicted and crazed.

We laugh at these scare tactics today. But the government has not ended its efforts to modify behavior by using campaigns of exaggerations and lies. A new congressional report has found that the nation's most popular government-funded abstinence-only sex education programs are peppered with inaccuracies that misinform young people about the risks of sex, contraceptives and abortion. It's Reefer Madness all over again. Or, as one research group called it, "Scared Chaste."

One aspect of President Bush's continuing efforts to direct our tax money to religiously affiliated groups is the push for a massive expansion of federal funding for abstinence-only sex education. During the 2005 fiscal year, the federal government will spend $170-million to support programs that preach that sex is to be reserved for marriage only, and a number of the recipients of those dollars will be faith-based. That's more than double what was spent in 2001.

But unlike Bush's energetic concern over educational accountability and standards reflected in No Child Left Behind, the curricula for abstinence-only sex education programs are not vetted for accuracy. (There was an attempt by Democratic lawmakers in 2002 to require medical accuracy as a condition of receiving money for these programs, but that effort was voted down by Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee.)
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
It's truly fortunate the Republicans voted down the Democrat's effort to require that taxpayer funded sexuality education achieve and maintain high standards of medical accuracy. Everyone knows that the primary purpose of sexuality education is to produce kids who are scared and hysterical about their sexuality. And producing scared and hysterical kids is best done by feeding them distortions and lies about sex. Only with scared and hysterical kids running around can America continue to lead the Western world in nearly every category of sexuality related problem. Keep America a world leader! Oppose all efforts to provide comprehensive and accurate sexuality education!
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
Once again, I find that painted wolf and I agree... much to his dismay, I am sure!

The Bush Dynasty has never really bothered itself with accuracy or truth. Why should they start now?
 

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
her really but why quibble. :p

I am never dismayed to find a point of agreement with someone. You must start all good things with small steps.

wa:do
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Mr_Spinkles said:
Once again, it appears I am the victim of propoganda. Ah well.... *goes and puts additional clothes on*
Excellent idea, Mr. Spinkles! Always wear a double or tripple layer of clothing on dates. It's better to be safe rather than sorry!

And remember to wear double dipped latex gloves when you go out, Mr. Spinkles. And remind Ceridwen to wear them too! You never know when you might touch a doorknob that's been handled by an infected Goth.

You can trust good old Sunstone to keep you up to date on the latest in hysterical measures for "safe dating." Tune in here next week to find out why kevlar armored breast implants are superior to both natural breasts and silicone!
 
Top