Reality, the world external to the self, the set of all things with objective existence, the realm of the physical sciences, the place where your air, water, food, shelter, society and family are found, is out there, explored, described and largely explained by science. Nothing else comes close.1. I stated that materialism is unfounded because there's no evidence.
Whereas the concept of a real God, a god with objective existence, not imaginary, is incoherent, as witness the absence of any definition of God such that if we found a candidate for God in reality, we could determine whether it were God or not.
I take it that would also apply to incoherent notions such as a real God?2. You stated that thing without evidence can be rejected without evidence.
You're referring to a real God again, I take it?3. Yet you expect me to provide evidence for that which I'm saying has none.
I'm looking forward to your satisfactory definition of a real God with considerable interest then ─ one that let us determine what real things are Gods and what are not, one that will give a satisfactory and useful test for 'godness' that doesn't rely on imagination.Obviously not a worthy debate for me.