Psalm23
Well-Known Member
It's always difficult to have a discussion about a word, when we do not seem to agree on the usage of the word. Obviously, there are different ways to define the word "faith". I think the definition the OP is using is the common "firm belief in something which there is no conclusive evidence" use of the word, especially if we are talking about anything supernatural. Otherwise, it can be used to mean loyalty, sincere intentions, complete trust, etc. It sounds like you use the word to mean " trust", but not necessarily complete trust (since you just said you think nothing can be known for certain).
Let me see one of the ways you describe it:
Never mind, I didn't realize you thought faith is the result of evidence. This might be the first time I have ever heard anyone describe faith as a result based on evidence.
If we are using the word the way everyone else is using it, including the OP, then I definitely disagree. I don't think faith is required for "everything". In fact, I'm having a hard time thinking of anything here in the natural world that requires faith, outside of religion.
I don’t think faith has to be without evidence to be considered faith. I don’t consider it faith when there is camera footage of an event.