We Never Know
No Slack
Go with your irrelevant, it must be better than science lol
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Fascism - Why...
- Thread starter Secret Chief
- Start date
Friend of Mara
Active Member
Based on science. Guess you didn't google it.
We Never Know
No Slack
Its not my job to support your claims. That's your job.
Like I supported mine.
According to science no one is born gay, there is no gay gene.
There’s (Still) No Gay Gene | Harvard Magazine
Genes seem to play a role in determining sexual orientation, but it’s small, uncertain, and complicated.www.harvardmagazine.com
No ‘gay gene’: Massive study homes in on genetic basis of human sexuality
Nearly half a million genomes reveal five DNA markers associated with sexual behaviour — but none with the power to predict the sexuality of an individual.www.nature.com
There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms
A genetics study of nearly half a million people closes the door on a long-standing debate in sexuality.www-pbs-org.cdn.ampproject.org
Friend of Mara
Active Member
No you did not. There is no strait gene. There is no gay gene. The current theory on how sexuality is presented is not by a purely gentic representation of phenotypes. Much like a whole host of other human conditions and experiences are not linked to direct genes either even well after we have mapped the whole genome.
I didn't provide evidence because all three of the links you provided support my argument. Because you didn't read any of them except the title. Thank you for providing me three wonderful links even though the middle one is locked behind a paywall so neither of us can see it. Here is a copy paste from the third one.
Moreover, the researchers found that sexuality is polygenic — meaning hundreds or even thousands of genes make tiny contributions to the trait. That pattern is similar to other heritable (but complex) characteristics like height or a proclivity toward trying new things. (Things like red/green colorblindness, freckles and dimples can be traced back to single genes).
We Never Know
No Slack
"There is no gay gene"
Exactly! That's what my links supported. Thanks for admitting it.
Friend of Mara
Active Member
No "singular" gay gene. But go off. Do you have a point to make after this or are you done?
We Never Know
No Slack
Yeah.... There is no gay gene
What does a gay gene have to do with 'born gay'?
Last edited:
There is no hight gene, there is no hair colour gene, no skin colour gene. Even sex is determined by a chromosome, not a single gene.
That does not mean these things are not genetic or that they don’t have a genetic component. These things are the result of a myriad of different genes interacting with the environment and with each other.
Very few human traits ”have a gene”.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
No, hierarchy implies better than you. That tends ti be more destructive than helpful in the end.
But that doesn't mean people are not born gay, does it?
Your definition of Hierarchy is wrong; Hierarchy exists in many structures; families where the older child has more responsibility than the younger, nearly every business that has line workers, trainers, leads, managers, supervisors, etc; these are Hierarchy and they have nothing to do with sexism, racism, and all the other stuff you mentioned.
Perhaps your definition, but for most people, all that is required to be called homophobe is to disagree with homosexuality.
BTW what does it mean to disagree with a group of people who exist as they are?
Last edited:
No; hierarchy implies more RANK than you. Many structures require hierarchy in order to get things done.
I don’t know what you mean by disagree. Seems like a vague term in this context.
I mean you don’t have to be gay, you don’t have to participate. You can tell someone of the same gender that you are not interested, that is all fine.
But if judge someone, if you think their sexual expression is less valid than yours or should not be allowed, then I am pretty comfortable calling a person like that a bigot.
Friend of Mara
Active Member
Cool. What is the point beyond that. Anything you'd like to extrapolate and share with the class?
Friend of Mara
Active Member
Except it is in every single instance of fascism we have ever seen. There are "undesirables" in casts that are down a rung in these societies and the actions of a fascist are justified in their own minds because anything in the name of upholding the
What does it mean to disagree with homosexuality in this case that wouldn't lead to homophobia in your mind? A quiet voiceless distain in their mind while the gays are still allowed to enjoy equal rights with no harassments?
How can you be sure that nobody cheated on that election day?
Not even republicans did?
There might be a mouse living in your walls and you wouldn’t know it. But if there was an elephant sleeping in your bed you would notice it.How can you be sure that nobody cheated on that election day?
Not even republicans did?
Secret Chief
Veteran Member
I'm beginning to think there's a world short of dictionaries.