Parenthetically..., this is a disingenuous carp.
what a great name for gentile gefilte fish!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Parenthetically..., this is a disingenuous carp.
We eat sincere gefilte fish in our house!Parentheticallywhat a great name for gentile gefilte fish!
How concrete is evidence be when the investigation is still underway? And what do you make of the autoposy reports?
Since I haven't even mentioned hearsay, this is a disingenuous carp.
Yes, you misrepresent my statement, instead providing your own self-serving inference.Just to recap, Apex offered a radio show caller as evidence, you replied that only people who care about the evidence would read it (I had already read it), then I pointed out that it's the second hand account of a friend of the accused. The name for that is hearsay. Do you disagree?
I spoke to the broader issue that we don't have "all" the evidence.Only to the small minority who consider all the evidence.
Oh well you can't help that, Na. only joking.......but the claim does make sense, of course it all needs to go through the right avenues, which it will.
Taking the witness accounts together with the autopsy report, it seems to me Wilson quite possibly has very bad aim. If the witness who isn't brown's buddy and tweeted the event as it happened is correct, Wilson's first two shots missed. The next several shots in rapid succession mostly hit Brown's arm, in a line towards his head, and would have had to be prior to the fatal wound, which entered the top of Brown's head, indicating he was probably already down or falling when those final shots to the head were fired. It's noteworthy that there was no GSR and no sign of a struggle, so he could not have been close to the shooter, and if there was a physical altercation with the officer as some have suggested, it was a very minor one.
All speculation at this point of course. From my perspective, police should not be gunning people down in the street under any circumstances short of stopping one of those maniac killing sprees, so these details are not particularly relevant to my position on this issue.Nor are details regarding the personal character of the victim.
Yes, you misquote me, instead providing your own bizarre inferences.
If Josie's account happens to be more factual, Wilson's actions may make better sense from his perspective. No one is obligated to agree with it, but, when wondering how such an event could unfold, I think it's important to try to understand that other perspective.
Personal details on the character of the victim are absolutely important, in my opinion. I opine that Brown had a measure of control over this situation as well. If Josie's account is accurate, Brown could have opted to get out of the freaking road when asked to, by law enforcement.
All speculation, of course. I agree.
You're a legend in your own mind.Whatever Rev. Your tedious penchant for accusing me of lying and misrepresentation every time I better you in a debate fair and square is the entire reason I kept you on ignore for so long. You're making me regret taking you off now.
Sorry, but who is Josie?
Sorry, but who is Josie?
Cops are almost never prosecuted or even charged for killing people while on duty. I'd love to see it go through the right avenues, but I have very little confidence that it will.
My thoughts as well. I've spent a good amount of time today researching the law regarding use of deadly force by a police officer and there are so many semantic variances that could be used in his defense that I'd be very surprised if Wilson is even charged with a crime. It's all about his perception of a life threatening situation regardless if there was a weapon involved. We'll see. It's depressing, nonetheless.Cops are almost never prosecuted or even charged for killing people while on duty. I'd love to see it go through the right avenues, but I have very little confidence that it will.
Edit: You know, Josie from radio call?
Aye, so many have their mind made up with minimal evidence based upon their personalMy thoughts as well. I've spent a good amount of time today researching the law regarding use of deadly force by a police officer and there are so many semantic variances that could be used in his defense that I'd be very surprised if Wilson is even charged with a crime. It's all about his perception of a life threatening situation regardless if there was a weapon involved. We'll see. It's depressing, nonetheless.
Is she supposed to be on a first name basis with a radio caller?
Edit: You know, Josie from radio call?
Ah yes, I saw no reason to take her account into consideration, since she wasn't there and she is a personal friend of the accused.
FYI, I make allowances for the likely inaccuracy of Brown's friend's testimony too, but at least he was there.