Ferguson!

[Alceste]

So, you have made your mind up ?.

Not exactly. I'm predicting the future based on the past. I don't expect a serious effort from the authorities to do any more than manage the bad PR with their own counter-spin, but I will be pleasantly surprised if the killer is actually indicted and the case goes to trial.

 

[Alceste]

Is she supposed to be on a first name basis with a radio caller?

No kidding, particularly after making it completely clear that I have long since dismissed that particular account as hearsay.

 

[Alceste]

That's fine.

The point made was that her account closely aligns to Wilson's. If you care to understand his perspective, this is, thus far, the closest insight into what Wilson claims happened.

I'm interested in another perspective, as he's accused by the community of murder. To each their own.

I'm sure I had already heard the PD's version of events.

(Hey, if I call it into a radio show do I get to be offered as evidence too? )

 

[psychoslice]

Not exactly. I'm predicting the future based on the past. I don't expect a serious effort from the authorities to do any more than manage the bad PR with their own counter-spin, but I will be pleasantly surprised if the killer is actually indicted and the case goes to trial.

Killer ?, how do you know this ?, that's not fare to call him a killer without knowing the full facts, I thought you would like to know all the fact first ?.

 

[CynthiaCypher]

I'm sure I already heard the PD's version of events.

In fact we have been hearing it over and over again more than any other version of events.

 

[dawny0826]

No kidding, particularly after making it completely clear that I have long since dismissed that particular account as hearsay.

In fairness to you, I assumed that you commented after listening to it...on this thread. Sarcasm aside, I shouldn't have assumed.

 

[xkatz]

Killer ?, how do you know this ?, that's not fare to call him a killer without knowing the full facts, I thought you would like to know all the fact first ?.

Well, he did kill someone. Whether it was intentional or not, in self-defense or not, I can't say. I don't like to make assumptions about such things when the only source is MSM.

 

[dawny0826]

In fact we have been hearing it over and over again more than any other version of events.

In all honesty, that's the first that I'd heard/seen a perspective comparable to Wilson's. Until this thread, I have only seen news media depicting eyewitness accounts. I'm not discounting that there haven't been multiple accounts of his story, but, I have yet to read/see it.

 

[freethinker44]

Killer ?, how do you know this ?, that's not fare to call him a killer without knowing the full facts, I thought you would like to know all the fact first ?.

It's not really disputed that the cop killed him, so... yeah, killer.

 

[Alceste]

In fairness to you, I assumed that you commented after listening to it...on this thread. Sarcasm aside, I shouldn't have assumed.

No, I read the transcript this morning elsewhere on the web and tuned out as soon as it was revealed that the woman was not a witness.

 

[Alceste]

In fact we have been hearing it over and over again more than any other version of events.

Exactly.

 

[Buttercup]

Killer ?, how do you know this ?, that's not fare to call him a killer without knowing the full facts, I thought you would like to know all the fact first ?.

There is no disputing the fact that Wilson killed Brown. What's up for investigation is if it was a criminal homicide committed by Wilson. Wilson is a "killer", regardless.

 

[dawny0826]

No, I read the transcript this morning elsewhere on the web and tuned out as soon as it was revealed that the woman was not a witness.

Got it.

 

[psychoslice]

Well, he did kill someone. Whether it was intentional or not, in self-defense or not, I can't say. I don't like to make assumptions about such things when the only source is MSM.

Yes I agree, and that is why I asked the question, hell none of us were there and here we are mouthing off lol.

 

[Alceste]

Killer ?, how do you know this ?, that's not fare to call him a killer without knowing the full facts, I thought you would like to know all the fact first ?.

Wilson is a killer in that he just killed somebody. What we don't know is whether he is a murderer, which is a pretty specific crime.

 

[psychoslice]

Wilson is a killer in that he just killed somebody. What we don't know is whether he is a murderer, which is a pretty specific crime.

Try calling the soldiers when coming home from war killers, I don't think it would go over very well.

 

[freethinker44]

I don't like to make assumptions about such things when the only source is MSM.

Yeah, I want to see the police report. It's kind of suspicious that they haven't released it yet. Must be great to hear the public narrative and see an autopsy from three different doctors and gather all the evidence about the case so they have maximum amount of time to craft the perfect explanation. They should have released on day one.

 

[Alceste]

Try calling the soldiers when coming home from war killers, I don't think it would go over very well.

With soldiers you don't necessarily know if they have killed anybody. Some of them are medics, engineers and such like.

 

[psychoslice]

With soldiers you don't necessarily know if they have killed anybody. Some of them are medics, engineers and such like.

DAh, I know that, but I'm using that as an example.

 

[Alceste]

DAh, I know that, but I'm using that as an example.

I don't understand why. I have no affection for soldiers, and so don't care what they think of how I describe them. If they've killed, I would also refer to them as "the killer" and the deceased as "the victim " when discussing the killing. It's just accurate.