• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

First Cause

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
Unlikely but not impossible. :)
Let's try a bad paraphrase:

In the beginning everything existed together. In this alltogether a world was conceived and all the rest was darkness; without form, and void. And the spirit of cause and effect moved on the alltogether and there was light. The light separated from the darkness and behold! there was a little tiny universe.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
Let's try a bad paraphrase:

In the beginning everything existed together. In this alltogether a world was conceived and all the rest was darkness; without form, and void. And the spirit of cause and effect moved on the alltogether and there was light. The light separated from the darkness and behold! there was a little tiny universe.
I’m not clear what the purpose of you writing that is though. It strikes me as too poetic and unspecific to be any kind of clear hypothesis for the origins of the universe and we have the problem of only having words coined for things within the universe to try to describe possible things and concepts outside or beyond it.
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
I’m not clear what the purpose of you writing that is though. It strikes me as too poetic and unspecific to be any kind of clear hypothesis for the origins of the universe and we have the problem of only having words coined for things within the universe to try to describe possible things and concepts outside or beyond it.
I'm not a physicist. Anything past trigonometry baffles me but I'm pretty good with English so this is the simplest most comprehensive example I have of explaining the concept.

Please let me know how it violates what we know about the natural world. Perhaps then I could use some inconprehesible language to describe it. Maybe I'll speak it in tongues.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
I'm not a physicist. Anything past trigonometry baffles me but I'm pretty good with English so this is the simplest most comprehensive example I have of explaining the concept.
But why are you trying to explain the concept in the first place? It should be clear I’m fully aware of this kind of idea as a possible basis for the existence of the universe and I think I’ve made clear that in this area I accept anything as possible but nothing as certain. If you’re trying to convince me of something being certain (or even more likely than any alternative), you would need more technical detail (to be honest, probably more than either of us are capable of, certainly here).
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
But why are you trying to explain the concept in the first place? It should be clear I’m fully aware of this kind of idea as a possible basis for the existence of the universe and I think I’ve made clear that in this area I accept anything as possible but nothing as certain. If you’re trying to convince me of something being certain (or even more likely than any alternative), you would need more technical detail (to be honest, probably more than either of us are capable of, certainly here).
You keep asking the questions. I'm just answering them.
 

sandy whitelinger

Veteran Member
God first, universe after. God is the first cause.
Have you followed my thread. I'm postulating that cause and effect did not happen until after the universe began. Therefore there was no cause that changed the singularity into the universe. God must have played another role.
 
Last edited:
Top