It does!Sounds like the nutso's who think the gubment's comin' to take ther guns.
But paranoia doesn't mean they are not actually out to get you.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It does!Sounds like the nutso's who think the gubment's comin' to take ther guns.
It does!
But paranoia doesn't mean they are not actually out to get you.
I wouldn't determine reality by looking solely at "usually".True. However, they do usually coincide.
I wouldn't determine reality by looking solely at "usually".
One must look at both.True. However, it's better than determining reality by looking solely at "rarely."
One must look at both.
Getting a vaccine for something doesn't make you a repellent for the germs or something though. It just means that once exposed that your body can fight it off without you succumbing to the illness. If you are exposed to the virus, have the germs on you, say you touch something or someone infected, don't wash your hands, and proceed to touch someone else, you can still transmit the flu to someone else even if you had the flu shot. It is upon that other person to have their shot or not as to whether they are going to have the ability to ward off the flu...not you. So while yes, it may lessen your chance of being a carrier, that is, being sick for a prolonged period and being able to carry the disease to others more proficiently, it doesn't mean that by pure means of germ progression and hygiene matters that you can't transmit the flu just because you've had the shot.
But the paranoid tend to survive.
But in the long run we're all dead.The vast majority of people tend to survive.
So it helps....
I thought that's what you were implying here:Did I imply that a flu shot was a guarantee against transmitting the flu? I was told that the purpose was to hedge our bets against spreading the virus as fast as it could.
I was just trying to point out that having the shot doesn't mean that transmission is out of the question, just that you are less likely to be a long term carrier. And then, only of specific strains.I resisted until this year, when my doctor insisted I get the flu shot because I'm around young children so much.
I was told that it is not only about protecting myself, but that I could transmit the disease to others without getting sick. So it's to protect the children and their families that I come into contact with.
It was enough of an argument for me to get one.
Well, that's good. If any of those things have worked in your favor, then that's great for you. I don't get sick often anyway. I have allergy issues I deal with regularly, but that's not getting sick. I had a sinus infection a couple months ago, but that's so rare for me I can't even remember the last time before that that I was really sick. So I just trust in my own immune system. Everyone is different.As of today, I have not gotten sick with the flu or any major cold this year. Typically I get sick with aches, fever, vomiting, and congestion a few times every year. I can't say for sure that it was the result of the flu shot or if my change in diet or my stress levels have changed were all causes in a stronger immune system, but I can say that it didn't hurt to get the flu shot.
But in the long run we're all dead.
Ya know, our silly & trite little aphorisms will offend normal folk if we keep this up too long.
Perhaps just a few more & we should call it quits for the day, eh?
Well, do you? Have you ever had one? Do you regularly get them, or only once in a while?
Just don't expect me to offer you any "satisfaction".Ah, the two of you at it again...KT and Rev...you two keep this up and you won't offend me...you'll turn me on.
This season at least, we both chose the same course of action.Then even more reason not to waste our time getting vaccines of questionable value.
No scientific studies? Really?Indeed, when a vaccine can be shown to "obviously work" and be safe, then there is no need for suspicion. For example, vaccines for small pox and polio, when introduced, reduced the cases of those diseases immediately and significantly. Traditionally, most vaccines fall into this category. Their beneficial effects can be measured and seen, so you know they are actually effective. Conversely, the flu vaccine, has no scientific studies which show that it reduces the number of cases of flu in the real world. However, it does have a very big and continuing marketing campaign.
So, has it been proven that the flu vaccine harms people? What are the dangers of the flu vaccine for the average person? If the risk is low, and the benefit can be great, then why wouldn't you take those odds?If after looking at the actual facts of the dangers and benefits of aspirin you feel this way, then you should definitely not take it. The important thing is to question things, learn things, and develop the skill of making rational decisions based on facts, knowledge, and other relevant variables.