• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Former Canadian Ambassador to Tehran: Argo Full of Fabricated Scenes

h05531n

Member
TEHRAN (FNA)- Kenneth Douglas Taylor, the former Canadian ambassador to Iran, who was portrayed as hero in Ben Affleck's anti-Iran movie, Argo, stated that the film's Oscar-nominated screenwriter "had no idea what he's talking about".

A1135572.jpg


On November 4, 1979, Iranian university students took over the US embassy building (which later came to be known as the US spy den) to thwart Washington's plots against the Islamic Revolution. Inside the embassy, the students found shredded documents which proved their convictions.

Since then, Iranians have celebrated the Nov. 4 takeover of the embassy, when 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days.

But, the newly produced and staged movie, Argo, a 2012 American thriller film directed by Ben Affleck, shows Tony Mendez, a CIA operative, led the rescue of six US diplomats from Tehran. The US and Canadian officials stress that the story is true.

The film shows Militants storm the US embassy in Tehran on November 4, 1979, in retaliation for the nation's sheltering the recently deposed Shah. More than 50 of the embassy staff are taken as hostages, but six escape and hide in the home of the Canadian ambassador.

For more than 30 years, Taylor has been celebrated as the hero who sheltered six US diplomats at the Canadian embassy in Iran and then helped get them out of the country on fake passports.

Canada's former Ambassador to Iran Ken Taylor took sly jabs at the Ben Affleck-directed box office hit during a talk with Ryerson University students on Thursday.

He took issue with a myriad of creative liberties that included the "black and white" portrayal of Iranian people, fabricated scenes and the suggestion he was little more than a meek observer to CIA heroics.

While recognizing that Argo's primary goal was entertainment, Taylor says an upcoming documentary will present a more balanced picture of his role and the situation in Iran.

"After I saw the movie I decided that I did bring one particular skill to this movie: That was opening and closing a door," Taylor said to laughs, referring to the relatively small role he seemed to play, as portrayed by Canadian actor Victor Garber.

"We could go on but the amusing side is the script writer in Hollywood had no idea what he's talking about."

Taylor pointed to a scene toward the end in which he's asked what he will do as escapees head to the airport. The movie version of himself responds that he'll leave by train in half an hour.

"A train hasn't left Tehran station for anywhere for three years," he noted.

Screenwriter Chris Terrio is up for a best adapted screenplay Oscar.

Nonetheless jovial and full of compliments for the film's sheer entertainment value, Taylor's comments were offered alongside a more critical Robert Wright, author of "Our Man in Tehran: Ken Taylor and the Iran Hostage Crisis."

"Argo" has swept recent awards bashes and heads into the Oscars later this month as a front-runner in the race for best picture.

Affleck directs and also stars as CIA agent Tony Mendez, who teams up with a Hollywood producer (Alan Arkin) to disguise the six US citizens as a Canadian film crew working on a fake science-fiction film called "Argo."'

Taylor said the film does little to dissuade notions that Iran is "one long revolution and riot," noting that "it characterizes people in a way that isn't quite right."

He said he spent almost three years in Tehran and never felt in jeopardy, describing Iranian hospitality as "warm and genuine."

"The movie maybe didn't give a chance that there's another side to Iranian society which is unfortunate - that is a more conventional side, a more hospitable side and an intent that they were looking for some degree of justice and hope and that it all wasn't just a violent demonstration for nothing," he said.

Link
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Just so you know, we know Argo is entertainment, & not a documentary.
I wouldn't expect anything in particular to be true, even if loosely based upon some real events.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
One good aspect of Argo....with Breaking Bad on hiatus, I got to see Bryan Cranston perform.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Fun film, definitely got silly at the end, and pretty racist throughout. Middle east? Let's fill it with angry swarthy men shouting over each other in Arabic!
 

steeltoes

Junior member
That's what movies are, fabricated scenes.

Anyways, haven't seen it yet but have read about Kenneth Douglas Taylor's take on it. I'm not surprised by what he says.
 

Levite

Higher and Higher
It never pretended to be a documentary.

When films say that they are "based on a true story," that means that they took a true story, heavily fictionalized it, changed whatever they felt like changing, compressed events and composited characters, and made it into what they felt would be a piece of drama that would do well at the box office.

I would hope that anyone with even a lick of sense would know enough not to presume that a major Hollywood film directed by Ben Affleck would be a factual, journalistic account of events.

Personally, I enjoyed Argo. I thought it was a nicely done little film, well written, well acted, well directed, well shot, and with a pretty realistic feel. Granted, the last few minutes with the chase down the tarmac was awfully Hollywood, but even so, I thought it was highly entertaining.

And I can't see calling it racist. It was set during the Iranian revolution, of course there will be mobs of agitated and aggressive Middle Eastern guys. And since it revolves around the American hostage crisis, of course the Iranians will be the bad guys. Seems kind of silly to expect anything else.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And I can't see calling it racist. It was set during the Iranian revolution, of course there will be mobs of agitated and aggressive Middle Eastern guys. And since it revolves around the American hostage crisis, of course the Iranians will be the bad guys. Seems kind of silly to expect anything else.
Andd it's especially wrong to decry their speaking Arabic...since they speak Farsi. (They're not Arabs.)
Besides, I thought the movie made the fanatics look intelligent, but just gripped the fervor of the times.
 
Last edited:

Alceste

Vagabond
It never pretended to be a documentary.

When films say that they are "based on a true story," that means that they took a true story, heavily fictionalized it, changed whatever they felt like changing, compressed events and composited characters, and made it into what they felt would be a piece of drama that would do well at the box office.

I would hope that anyone with even a lick of sense would know enough not to presume that a major Hollywood film directed by Ben Affleck would be a factual, journalistic account of events.

Personally, I enjoyed Argo. I thought it was a nicely done little film, well written, well acted, well directed, well shot, and with a pretty realistic feel. Granted, the last few minutes with the chase down the tarmac was awfully Hollywood, but even so, I thought it was highly entertaining.

And I can't see calling it racist. It was set during the Iranian revolution, of course there will be mobs of agitated and aggressive Middle Eastern guys. And since it revolves around the American hostage crisis, of course the Iranians will be the bad guys. Seems kind of silly to expect anything else.

ALL of the Iranians will be the bad guys?

I'm skeptical. Everyone I know who has been to the middle east has commented on the hospitality and friendliness of Arabs, much like you hear from this ambassador. Even in Palestine, where conflict is continuous.

Perhaps we have seen so many Hollywood movies featuring shouting, angry Arabs that we can't even see the racism any more.
 
Not exactly a surprising revelation, considering that the same interests that bind Hollywood together at the political level are also quite prevalent on Capitol Hill.

Hollywood, like much of the entertainment industry has often served as the propaganda arm of those in Washington.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Argo's portrayal of Iranians did not look racist to me. It even made a point of showing several Iranians attempting to be reasonable under a climate that definitely did not facilitate such a posture.

The movie is definitely very slanted, but not on those grounds. It is instead tainted by the unfortunate glorification of violent action that Hollywood has been suffering from in the last thirty years or so. Even then, it is if anything remarkable for its degree of restraint on this matter.

Hollywood isn't generally inclined to make anti-Arab movies, but it is definitely way too used to make pro-lead ones for its own good.

Oh, and it does go out of its way to portray Americans as the prime mover of everything that is worth pursuing, and in this stance it does so very much at odds with historical facts.
 
Hollywood isn't generally inclined to make anti-Arab movies, but it is definitely way too used to make pro-lead ones for its own good.

I think this point is debatable:

Anti-Arabism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh, and it does go out of its way to portray Americans as the prime mover of everything that is worth pursuing, and in this stance it does so very much at odds with historical facts.

This is true.

In the American film industry, the Good are the United States and the Bad are those whom the United States decrees as such. The Good are fundamentally and wholly Good and the Bad are fundamentally and wholly Bad. The United States is always in the right and always wins, whilst the “Bad Guys” are always in the wrong and always lose.
 
Top