• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Fraud took place in the 2004 election through electronic voting machines

Rex

Founder
THURSDAY Nov. 4 2004: If you are concerned about what happened Tuesday, Nov. 2, you have found a home with our organization. Help America Audit.

Black Box Voting has taken the position that fraud took place in the 2004 election through electronic voting machines. We base this on hard evidence, documents obtained in public records requests, inside information, and other data indicative of manipulation of electronic voting systems. What we do not know is the specific scope of the fraud. We are working now to compile the proof, based not on soft evidence -- red flags, exit polls -- but core documents obtained by Black Box Voting in the most massive Freedom of Information action in history. We need: Lawyers to enforce public records laws. Some counties have already notified us that they plan to stonewall by delaying delivery of the records. We need citizen volunteers for a number of specific actions. We need computer security professionals willing to GO PUBLIC with formal opinions on the evidence we provide, whether or not it involves DMCA complications. We need funds to pay for copies of the evidence.

www.blackboxvoting.org
 

Bastet

Vile Stove-Toucher
*sigh* Why not just go back to paper ballots? Seems like all this electronic stuff is just begging to be manipulated...
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I'm going to take a wait and see attitude on this one. Wait and see if this organization can come up with any hard evidence of fraud to back its claims. But I agree with Bastet that this electronic stuff is begging to be manipulated. It seems to me that it's only a matter of time before someone does hack the vote, so long as we have machines which leave no paper trail.
 

skills101

Vicar of Christ
Wow, the system is so stupid! I was listening to the radio the other day, and they had an hour where people who voted twice or more could call in... There was call after call after call. Is it so wrong to ask for identification??? Phew...
 

Rex

Founder
Update:



In Baker County, for example, with 12,887 registered voters, 69.3% of them Democrats and 24.3% of them Republicans, the vote was only 2,180 for Kerry and 7,738 for Bush, the opposite of what is seen everywhere else in the country where registered Democrats largely voted for Kerry.

In Dixie County, with 4,988 registered voters, 77.5% of them Democrats and a mere 15% registered as Republicans, only 1,959 people voted for Kerry, but 4,433 voted for Bush.

The pattern repeats over and over again - but only in the counties where optical scanners were used. Franklin County, 77.3% registered Democrats, went 58.5% for Bush. Holmes County, 72.7% registered Democrats, went 77.25% for Bush. http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1106-30.htm
 
Top